facebook rss twitter

AMD rages against "benchmarketing"

by Sylvie Barak on 6 November 2009, 10:02

Tags: AMD (NYSE:AMD)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qaurn

Add to My Vault: x

Notebooks to be judged like washing machines

The key question proof points are supposed to answer for the potential punter is "what do you want to use the machine for?" said Schwarzbach, adding "We feel there's a winning value proposition there."

The chip-maker feels that now that notebooks are becoming as ubiquitous as washing machines, proof points should displace the emphasis currently placed on performance benchmarks, although how realistic that vision is remains to be seen.

AMD says it has three priorities when it comes to proof points, with the first being comparisons within current AMD platform families. Second priority would be against AMD predecessor platforms and last but by no means least, AMD's third priority is to proof point its machines against the competition.

 

But the firm did acknowledge that the move would probably not go down well with the "vocal minority" of enthusiasts who gave a lot of importance to the speeds and feeds of new machines on the market.

 

It will certainly be interesting to see if this particular strategy gets a good run on the playing field, or whether it simply gets 'benched'.

 



HEXUS Forums :: 16 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Be interesting to see if it takes off. It does however remind us of the problem, there isn't a universal benchmark you can use. The Windows Experience Index proofs this, what we need is a few different ratings of various tasks.
It's a fair point. Benchmark numbers are only applicable to a tiny percentage of laptop/netbook home users - the enthusiasts and gamers. Those numbers mean sod all to Joe Public.
Deleted
It's a fair point. Benchmark numbers are only applicable to a tiny percentage of laptop/netbook home users - the enthusiasts and gamers. Those numbers mean sod all to Joe Public.

Precisely. We need a generic metric that gives Joe Public a idea what they're paying for, that is easy to understand. Provided OEMs stick to the Vision guidelines, and they're strick enough, it should be a perfect metric to use. “So you just want to browse the web and check emails, well then this Netbook will be good as it's Vision Lite.” “Oh you watch the occassion movie off iTunes? Well this netbook can't play those movies, see, let me get you the Vision chart…” “Okay, we'll look for one of that class then.”

It'll be much easier, I mean how many times I've seen people buy a machine when the retailler was all but yelling at them not to get it and they return it a week later because “it doesn't work”. Sometimes you need to spend that extra £100.
Don't Dell already do this? Not to the extent that AMD seem to be planning, but they do have a set of icons on each machine's page to say what it should be used for.

I like the idea though, as long as vendors are actually honest about the machine's capabilities. I've seen machines with IGPs sold as gaming machines before on the justification that they can play games. That isn't on, the user won't get a good gaming experience out of the machine and will be dissatisfied with their purchase (if not at first then a year down the line). AMD need to set out strict guidelines, specifying the configurations that count at a certain level. It might be easier just to offer the OEMs one “Vision” configuration at each level, the Vision brand needs to be consistent from across all OEMs.
Deleted
I like the idea though, as long as vendors are actually honest about the machine's capabilities.
Which is why certification is the way to go. Not dissimilar to the Microsoft one (with the ‘certified for Windows Vista’ or whatever), but while being a little less optimistic and more flexible.

It would need a big push from the OEMs themselves, and I can't see the likes of Sony going for it… their laptops are, after all, just the same as other laptops, but with an extra £100+ slapped on the top, so even Joe Public would know he's not going anything more than a £100+ badge.