facebook rss twitter

Laptop battery-life debate rages on

by Sylvie Barak on 5 November 2009, 14:27

Tags: AMD (NYSE:AMD)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qauq3

Add to My Vault: x

All-day battery life

"We're very excited to have the conversation about this," said Sobon, as she repeatedly expressed her dissatisfaction with "flawed battery benchmark" measurements.

Meanwhile Jonathan Seckler, AMD's senior manager for product marketing development, said Microsoft had been unfairly blamed for a lot when it came to battery sappage and that it was actually down to the hardware to become more power-efficient.

"You're not going to see incremental improvements in battery life over the next year from us," Seckler added, "you're going to see exponential improvements."

"This is something we're putting a lot of effort into," confirmed AMD's senior director of ASIC/layout design, Joe Macri, adding "It's a goal to get to a more realistic set of measurements."

"We haven't yet given you the experience that you want [when it comes to battery life]," admitted Macri. "You can have the thinnest, lightest computer, but if you're still carrying around this power brick, what's the point?"

"We are going to give you computers that last all day," Macri chimed in. "All-day compute is a mantra we have and we're going to achieve it sooner than you think," he said, adding that "all-day computing" was not going to be an empty promise because "buzz words don't sell, buzz words don't give you a good user experience."

Sobon pointed out that AMD's newer platforms had already made an improvement in terms of battery life, with most getting five to six hours on idle.

But Sobon said she still believed people were being deceived about battery life claims and called for better active-versus-resting-time measurements to be thought up as soon as possible.

What we think

We agree that battery life should be reported with reference to three scenarios: near-idle (web-surfing, for example), mid-load (watching a movie), and full-load (playing a game). The trouble for AMD is that a side-by-side comparison of a company's otherwise-identical AMD- and Intel-powered notebooks - Acer, for the sake of argument - usually shows battery life in favour of Intel. 

AMD, if you wish to disagree, please feel free to contact us.

 



HEXUS Forums :: 4 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Interesting that they are using the iPhone as a reference. I am not sure if battery life have improved since the 1st gen iPhone, or even how the iPhone compare to other smartphones, but I can definitely drain the battery of my 1st gen in under a day even when running no gaming/Wi-fi applications.
The biggest problem is that many manufacturers plain do not cite any kind of battery life. Every mobile product should be required to detail minimal and maximum battery life in the product specifications, where it can be plainly seen.
Min/Max? That could be quite useless if its far appart?

What about Median, Mean and some SD?

Its hard to do really. Even ‘web browsing’ could mean something that is very heavy like youtube or myface, or something lightweight like reading a very long article on wikipedia.
TheAnimus
Its hard to do really. Even ‘web browsing’ could mean something that is very heavy like youtube or myface, or something lightweight like reading a very long article on wikipedia.
I would even go as far as saying that basic Office use would be lighter on a laptop than basic web browsing. Once Word of Excel is loaded there are fairly few disk read/writes, just paging is there isn't enough memory and periodic saves really. With browsing you are hitting the disk cache all the time.