facebook rss twitter

Review: Powerline networking - can it deliver?

by Michael Harries on 6 August 2008, 05:20

Tags: ZyXEL

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qaoma

Add to My Vault: x

Corinex device-to-device connectivity and compatibility

Device-to-device connectivity


We then switched to a mode where the devices would directly link our two test PCs, initially with the two AV200s, with IP addresses configured manually, located at either side of the HEXUS.labs testing area - representing pretty much ideal placement. We would then reposition one of the adapters at the other side of the HEXUS offices to test performance under less-favourable circumstances.

Our media test involves streaming a 26.43Mbps 1080p HDV video file from the Foxconn test system running Cyberlink media server, over the powerline network, to the MSI system running Cyberlink SoftDMA.

With the optimal positioning of the AV200 adapters, they gave the same experience as when using Gigabit ethernet, with no dropped frames.

With the devices located at the extremes of the office, there wasn't sufficient performance to playback the video with each frame taking tens of seconds to load. It would seem that Corinex's claim of 1080p-based streaming is true if the devices are well located in relation to each other, but not when less-than-ideally placed.

Compatability with other devices

There are several standards for powerline networking, with the main competitors being HomePlug and Universal PowerLine Alliance (UPA). With both Corinex and Netgear are both part of the UPA, we would hope their devices would be cross-compatible.

We tried to get a Netgear HX101 to communicate with one of the Corinex devices, setting them to the same network, and manually configuring their IP addresses, but were unsuccessful. The Netgear utility would see another device, but the systems were not able to ping each other.

As such, if you wish to add more devices to your powerline network you may be tied to a specific vendor.