facebook rss twitter

Review: Sapphire FirePro W9100

by David Ross on 27 October 2015, 12:00

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qacu6i

Add to My Vault: x

Conclusion

Masses of onboard memory, a proven architecture and excellent connectivity are the standout features of this premium professional card.

The recent trend in consumer PC graphics cards has favoured Nvidia's GeForce cards over AMD's Radeon. Sapphire realised the tide was turning some time ago and has duly invested in professional workstation graphics marketed under the FirePro banner.

Currently headlined by the Hawaii-based W9100, Sapphire is the only AMD partner in a position to retail their own card after inking an exclusive global agreement a couple of years ago, albeit with cards based on the reference design.

These professional GPUs require different evaluation than their gaming cousins, and, playing to its strengths, the W9100's enhanced double-precision ability comes to the fore when absolute accuracy of calculation is key.

Performance is generally better in pure synthetic tests than with benchmarks based on real-world applications, where Nvidia's latest professional cards tend to do better, particularly the recently-introduced Quadro M6000.

Workstation users who need flexible outputs and solid performance in large-dataset double-precision workloads - which is more common than you may at first think - should certainly consider the Sapphire FirePro W9100 as the card of choice. Masses of onboard memory, a proven architecture and excellent connectivity are the standout features of this premium professional card.

The Good
 
The Bad
Excellent double-precision perf
Massive framebuffer
Restrained vocals
Big improvement over last-gen
 
Not great in real-world apps
Big card



Sapphire AMD FirePro W9100

HEXUS.where2buy

The Sapphire FirePro W9100 professional graphics card is available to purchase from Scan Computers*.

HEXUS.right2reply

At HEXUS, we invite the companies whose products we test to comment on our articles. If any company representatives for the products reviewed choose to respond, we'll publish their commentary here verbatim.



HEXUS Forums :: 5 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
So basically what I got out of this review is that programs that are still more optimized for CUDA have the M6000 in the lead and those that actually use Open CL and do it well the W9100 kicks ass, basically AMD cards are far more powerful then Nvidea cards for compute performance Open CL just hasn't matured yet still.
Yup, that about sums it up, sertin12.
Most of the tests which have the M6000 in the lead (Viewperf) are not using CUDA. It's just OGL acceleration, etc. The bigger problem for Viewperf is the issue of optimisation over time, eg. results from other tests can be different, though it's an issue for both vendors.

However, where OCL and CUDA are compared for the same test, CUDA still often comes out ahead on the M6000, it's just a lot more mature (see the ratGPU data on this link):

http://www.tomsitpro.com/articles/nvidia-quadro-m6000,2-898-2.html

Where the FirePro wins hands down though is for OCL FP64 (eg. Monte Carlo Option Pricing).

So it's not just an issue about compute acceleration, in many cases the OGL drivers and basic speed are simply better on NV atm, but this sort of thing bounces back & forth over time. Still, I'd prefer NV overall, keep finding they have better drivers.

Ian.
thanks for this review, is really hard to find PRO card review around the net.
But… I would love to see some consumer/gaming class cards along the pro ones.

Also I have being wondering what is the purpose of anything below the W7XXX range because they seem like they can only driver more monitors than doing anything else. Or at least this is the picture I have from older reviews. If you are about to get a small quadro or firepro, just get a high end gaming card and you are fine.
nitro912gr writes:
> If you are about to get a small quadro or firepro, just get a high end gaming card and you are fine.

It's not as simple as that. There are reliability, support, heat and other issues which may mean using a gamer card is a bad idea. If these don't matter though, then a gamer card can be an alternative. Mind you, used Quadro cards can be a bargain way to gain access to better quality pro performance & features, eg. recently I obtained a K5000 for just a little over 200 UKP.

Ian.