facebook rss twitter

Microsoft removes XP Mode hardware requirements

by Parm Mann on 19 March 2010, 16:02

Tags: Windows 7, Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qawpi

Add to My Vault: x

Microsoft has today eased the transition to Windows 7 for business users by announcing that XP Mode will now function without the need for specific CPUs.

XP Mode, a virtual machine package for Windows 7 containing a pre-installed version of Windows XP, allows users to run a virtual Windows XP environment through which older applications can retain compatibility. The introduction of XP Mode has been deemed critical in convincing business users to upgrade to Windows 7, but originally launched with specific hardware requirements - XP mode would only run on systems equipped with processors supporting Intel VT or AMD-V.

The software giant has today lifted that restriction by making available an updated XP Mode package that "no longer requires hardware virtualisation technology".

"This change simplifies the experience by making virtualisation more accessible to many more PCs for small and midsize businesses wanting to migrate to Windows 7 Professional or higher editions, while still running Windows XP-based productivity applications," said Microsoft in a statement.

Whether or not running XP Mode without a Intel VT or AMD-V processor will have an adverse effect on performance remains to be seen, but Microsoft will be hoping the change will encourage more business users to make the transition to Windows 7.

Having launched in October 2009, Windows 7 has become Microsoft's fastest selling operating system of all time with sales of over 90 million, but still occupies less than 10 per cent of the global market. Microsoft's nine-year-old Windows XP - an operating system that remains prevalent among enterprise users - commands over 65 per cent market share.

The updated XP Mode is available at windows.com/xpmode



HEXUS Forums :: 6 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Only because Intel have a completely insanely senselessly random CPU feature/flag policy.
My first thought was that AMD wouldn't be happy - AMD-V right down to the Sempron 140 looked like quite a selling point, to me.

Be interested to know what the performance hit is on non-hardware virtualisation. I also think AMD should make more of their ECC support too, tbh…
aidanjt
Only because Intel have a completely insanely senselessly random CPU feature/flag policy.

Not at all. It requires a CPU with hardware VT. That's VT-x for Intel and AMD-V for AMD. It's not “random” at all. If you need a list of CPUs that support that, visit each manufacturer's website.

I personally feel, after experience using it, that XPM is a waste mostly because it's not just a VM and not just RDP but you are using resources on the host and guest at the same time. Most businesses probably have virtualized solutions and terminal servers that offer better options.
12GaugeShotty
Not at all. It requires a CPU with hardware VT. That's VT-x for Intel and AMD-V for AMD. It's not “random” at all. If you need a list of CPUs that support that, visit each manufacturer's website.
What are you talking about?

Go take a look at Intel's entire desktop and laptop CPU range, and try to find a pattern to their features, particularly with VT-x. It's a mess.
scaryjim
Be interested to know what the performance hit is on non-hardware virtualisation. I also think AMD should make more of their ECC support too, tbh…

Well, look at any old old old benchmarks for VMware or Virtual PC comparing hardware-enabled and non-hardware-enabled virtualization. Really all they're doing is providing an older, slower version of VirtualPC for older, slower machines.