facebook rss twitter

Microsoft and McAfee warn of worms

by Sylvie Barak on 3 November 2009, 08:31

Tags: Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT), McAfee (NASDAQ:INTC)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qaupj

Add to My Vault: x

Worms are not your friend

There may be nothing friendly and sociable about hackers, but according to reports by both McAfee and Microsoft, the online scammers are spending more and more time cracking into social networks using phishing ploys, worms and Trojans.

Microsoft's security trend report - covering the first half of this year - noted a significant spike in phishing attacks in May and June 2009, which it reckons was caused by a number of hacking campaigns targeting social-networking sites during those months.

 Unsurprisingly, banking sites, e-tailer sites, and online gaming sites were also ripe targets for attack, with Trojans still representing the most widespread method in the hackers' arsenal.

Worms, however, also managed to wiggle their way up from fifth place in the security risk stakes in H208 to second place in 1H09. Microsoft blames this on both the infectious Conficker and Taterf worms which spread rapidly through massive multiplayer online role-playing games (MMORPGs) in the latter half of the year.

In its report, Microsoft also boasts that it managed to not only detect, but also wipe out a plethora of "rogue security software" from some from 13.4 million computers during the first half of 2009, with the number of "total unique vulnerability disclosures" across the industry down significantly compared to this time last year.

Browser vulnerabilities increased a bit, but OS security holes apparently remained unchanged. Having said that, Microsoft did point out that infection rates for Windows Vista were a fair bit lower than for Windows XP, while the rate for Windows Server 2008 was also considerably less than Server 2003.

Meanwhile, McAfee's report fingered the U.S. as the number one spam distributor and the country with the most compromised "zombie" computers used in botnets to splutter out spam. It also has the dubious honour of being the country with the most servers hosting malware. China and Brazil followed in close second and third place.

McAfee also posited that 92 per cent of all e-mail sent out was actually Spam, a 24 per cent leap from last year.

 



HEXUS Forums :: 9 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
So.. 94% spam?

If we send around 200 billion a day - probably nearer to 250-300 by the end of this year - and each of those messages is 10kb, that's a whopping 2PB a day (that's PetaBytes). And if we assume that 95% of that is rubbish, then about 650PB of data is wasted along the internets every year…

To put that into perspective, you'd need 650,000 TB hard drives just storing text documents.

Of course emails range from pictures to large documents, so that figure is likely to be somewhat rough, it could be closer to 1EB!
@Whiternoise: Compression. But yes, that's a lot of wasted bandwidth.

I'm still waiting for an anti-spam device I can apply to the postman but I get odd looks standing at the door with a hammer.
pauldarkside
I'm still waiting for an anti-spam device I can apply to the postman but I get odd looks standing at the door with a hammer.
To get off junk mail, send off emails (with a throwaway address) to optout@royalmail.com (info at http://stopjunkmail.org.uk/features/door_to_door ) and yourchoice@dma.org.uk (info at http://www.mydm.co.uk/control-dm-faq.html#q10 ) with the address you want removed (no need to give them your name, you don't want to voluntarily give them more data, only thing they should need is the address). If you get junk mail delivered that has your name, fill this in also: http://www.mpsonline.org.uk/mpsr/mps_choosetype.html

More info here:
http://junkbuster.org.uk/

http://stopjunkmailblog.blogspot.com/2009/09/your-choice.html

http://stopjunkmail.org.uk/stickers/about.php#q_04
Making people pay to send mail was arguably the best anti-spam tactic that worked for postage, we need the same thing for email.
@Perfectionist

It's not that sort of spam that's the problem - don't get any of that. It's all the leaflet crap the postman drops through the door regardless of whether you've actually got real post or not. Everytime I'm checking my post, I do so standing by the recycle bag - it's amazing how quickly if fills up. Don't appreciate having my time wasted filtering it all.

Waste of time having a word with whomever's delivering as their faces change too often. A “no junk mail” note on the door doesn't work either.

(Sorry for OT rant)