vacancies advertise contact news tip The Vault
facebook rss twitter

AMD attempts to trump Thunder with Lightning

by Alistair Lowe on 13 January 2012, 17:05


Quick Link:

Add to My Vault: x

Demonstrated behind closed doors, AMD unveiled its answer to Intel's Thunderbolt interface, the 'Lightning Bolt'.

Developed alongside Apple, Intel's Thunderbolt interface allows for a Thunderbolt cable, sporting a Mini DisplayPort connector, to carry both the DisplayPort 1.2 and PCI Express protocols simultaneously over two full-duplex 10Gbps lanes, along with a 10W power supply. Pushed onto the market by Apple, the interface can supply power and a super high-speed connection to Thunderbolt peripherals or hubs, optionally reverting to supplying a standard DisplayPort 1.2 signal for DisplayPort devices.

The multi-purpose interface has been all the rage, not only for its exceptionally high performance but also for reducing the number of ports, cables and separate I/O chips required for devices. Until now AMD has been left out in the cold, however its new Lightning Bolt interface hopes to change the firm's interface fortunes.

AMD Lightning Bolt Interface

Like Thunderbolt, Lightning Bolt utilises a Mini DisplayPort connector and is capable of transmitting the DisplayPort protocol, however, instead of passing along a PCI Express signal, AMD has opted to support USB 3.0. The design is not perfect, USB 3.0 is half the speed of Thunderbolt at 5Gbps and AMD claims that whilst certainly faster than USB 2.0, Lightning Bolt will not be capable of reaching the full 5Gbps; likewise, the new interface can only support two monitors at 1080p. On the other-hand, almost no devices exist to fully exploit a 10Gbps connection at this stage in the game and thus far, USB 3.0 as a peripheral protocol has received the most adoption, amongst a wider range of manufacturers.

Lightning Bolt will also feature a power supply, though AMD is yet to release maximum ratings figures, with the firm claiming that all-together, only two pins required changing from a standard DisplayPort cable to make the new interface possible. The real advantage to AMD's approach is cost, with the firm suggesting that a muxing I/O chip for a notebook or similar device would likely amount to $1 and that a dock to demux the signal would be around the same cost as a typical USB 3.0 hub. The protocol is not yet finalised and so performance and specifications may change; this also means that the technology won't be ready for the launch of Trinity during the summer, however AMD does hope to have it on the market before the year is out.

More from CES 2012

HEXUS Forums :: 8 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Oh AMD, you so quaint, all those lovely ideas, shame that they are so late to market they feel like a trip to the museum.
I want the inventive, envelope pushing, intel beating AMD back. These desperate copycat attempts are kinda sad to see.
I don't know, I've always felt that Thunderbolt was a bit of a pain in the ass as it came before it's time, with USB 3.0 fairly new it felt as if it was intruding into a market that didn't need it and USB 3.0 hubs for Thunderbolt are really only just rearing their heads and quite costly. Personally I'd rather AMD been quicker on the uptake, all hail USB 3.0 and then something like Thunderbolt come out 5 years later, with a much improved spec.
Well thunderbolt was intended to support usb connections, but they were denied that.
why on earth is the market dividing like this? I want universal standards so i can use everything with everything. Convergence not bloody divergence :(