facebook rss twitter

Can Adobe Flash survive?

by Scott Bicheno on 5 February 2010, 16:44

Tags: Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL), Adobe (NASDAQ:ADBE), Bluestreak

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qavyh

Add to My Vault: x

Corporate chest-beating

One company that seems certain to push hard for HTML 5 is Apple. Jodoin reckoned a lot of the aggro between Adobe and Apple is ego-related - hardly surprising. With so much of the interplay that goes on between the big tech companies, much of what makes its way into the public domain is a combination of brinkmanship and chest-beating.

What else could explain the apparent cooperation between Apple and Google, who seem determined to take each other on in so many other areas? The one thing they both probably have in common in this case is a desire to unleash their huge software development resources on producing sexy web apps without having to go through a third part in order to do so.

This is bound to be a limiting factor for the other would-be player in the web video and animation platform game - Microsoft. It has Silverlight, which is considered by many to be a preferable platform to Flash. The problem is is has neither the inertia of Flash, nor the Apple and Google support of HTML 5.

However, as the only company that makes the operating system, the cloud services, the browser and the rich media platform, Microsoft has the potential to do something pretty special with Windows Phone 7 when it comes out. If it can enable sexy UIs and applications, and seamlessly sync with the cloud and with PCs, it could not only give Silverlight a strong USP, it could also render talk of full Windows not running on the ARM instruction set redundant.

So while Adobe certainly has inertia on its side with Flash, there are a hell of a lot of alternatives coming through. Google has recently shown its support for HTML 5 by launching a version of YouTube using it, and we can expect Apple to keep exploring alternatives. Adobe has better raise its game, and soon, if it doesn't want to get left behind in the great mobile Internet land-grab.

 



HEXUS Forums :: 28 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Yes because people really care about 3% of surfers.

What I think this shows is something bigger, for instance take the TFL website.
It has a simple indicator of tube line status, yet, on the iPhone there's an App for that (TM).

And with good reason, the app is a lot faster, better tailored to the device. A lot of people have this idea that the harmodginisation you naturally get with HTML is a good thing, its not for the user experience a lot of the time.

The amount of people that make web based systems for clients when really they would prefer a thicker client experience, then get all surprised when the client turns round to say “well actually we wanted something that wasn't runing in a web-browser”.

Which would you rather have on a slow network data system, a nice GUI app that loads only a few bytes of data, or something which has to load a whole HTML page, all the CSS, all the image resources, re-render a few times etc. A fat client app can give better battery life, lower data useage as well as obviously respond faster with a much better user experiance.

The thing with apple is flash go against their model, because you can address a lot of the short comings of HTML with flash, and that would stop the walled garden.

I think if anything this shows the demise of people wanting an HTML interface, despite what Google Mail, Google Office and Faceferrit users would say.

The question on my mind is if this is just for the mobile phone market, where the cramped device, slow network, slow page rendering really means that gmail is better done in a dedicated app, or is it for the desktop PC too?

I know I prefer outlook with xobni pro to gmail…..
TheAnimus
The thing with apple is flash go against their model, because you can address a lot of the short comings of HTML with flash, and that would stop the walled garden.
This is the key reason, in my opinion, that Apple refuse point blank to support Flash.

If done right, Flash can be great, it just isn't often done right. It's used for flashy graphics and animations. There is no reason you couldn't have a very capable app written in Flash, I'm sure it is capable of that these days. Personally I would rather use a Flash applet than a Java applet in the browser.
Indeed, banning a technology because a lot of people miss-use it is quite a stupid thing to do, as the people who wish to do such horrific things will just find another tool set to use.

Should people ban backcolor in HTML because people in the good old days used to nest them to create a flashing effect in netscape 2 or something similar……
Banning flash abuse should be God's 11th commandment.
I thought flash was just a benchmark for cpu coolers.

Does it actually have any other use?