facebook rss twitter

Punitive charges for unauthorised overdrafts to be curbed

by Scott Bicheno on 24 April 2008, 12:46

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qamus

Add to My Vault: x

Partial victory for OFT in unauthorised overdrafts case

A test case, agreed last July between the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) and seven high street banks plus the Nationwide Building Society, has resulted in a High Court ruling that the OFT has jurisdiction to regulate overdraft charges.

Mr. Justice Andrew Smith said the ruling does not ­– necessarily – mean the charges are unfair, and rejected the OFT’s contention that the banks’ terms and conditions were not sufficiently plain and intelligible.

Fees and interest for unauthorised overdrafts two years ago ranged from Alliance & Leicester’s £25 and 7.9%, to Lloyds TSB’s £30 and 29.8%. Now, however, things are less straightforward, with A&L, Lloyds and presumably many others charging flat fees linked to the length and size of the unauthorised overdraft (see update below).

The aim, clearly, is to force borrowers into formal contracts. It is not at all clear why the OFT regards this as a bad thing – moral risk is, to put it mildly, a red hot issue right now.

The BBC quoted Doug Taylor, personal finance campaigns manager at Which?, who said ‘the banks should do the right thing now and concede defeat, agree with the OFT what constitutes a fair unauthorised overdraft fee and refund their customers as soon as possible.’

There have been hundreds of thousands of claims by bank customers alleging overcharging since early 2006. The BBC estimated that last year the banks refunded about £784m to nearly 378,000 customers.

Barring an agreement between the banks and the OFT, pending cases will be on hold until the end of May, when the banks must decide whether they are going to appeal against Justice Smith’s ruling.

Banks generate about £3.5 billion a year from these charges, and any substantial reduction will accelerate the industry trend towards flat charges for ordinary account-holders who live within their means.

 

Update: 29th April 2008

Emile Abu-Shakra, the media relations manager at Lloyds TSB, contacted HEXUS.channel to clarify what it charges for unauthorised overdrafts. In keeping with our HEXUS Right2Reply policy we have reproduced the statement, verbatim, below.

From 2 November, customers who go over their limit will pay a flat monthly fee of £15 and then a lower unplanned borrowing fee on a daily basis, irrespective of how many transactions they make that day. Being over the limit by less than £25 will cost 6 per day, from £25 to £100 will cost £15 per day and over £100 will be £20 per day.

Interest rates on unplanned overdrafts reduced by a third or more

To make interest rates easier to understand, Lloyds TSB has streamlined its prices so that planned and unplanned overdraft rates are the same. Customers will pay the same interest rate for unplanned overdrafts as the rate they pay for planned borrowing. This rate varies from account to account but, typically, unplanned overdraft interest rates will be reduced by a third.



HEXUS Forums :: 10 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Hurrah…

Lloyds TSB screwed me over last month for £160 of charges. Guess what for? They waiting till the last week of the month to levy a charge on my account for an ‘administration’ fee of going overdrawn in January.

I rang them and asked if they could take the 30 pound fee the week later when they can CLEARLY see on their systems when I get paid each month. The woman on the end just smarmily said no… borrow it from someone you know.

Why is it the banks cannot be flexible on things like this, but now they're going to give a bit of leeway on people that have issues meeting their mortgage repayments?
I don't think the fee's themselves are nessercarily excessive.

What *is* a clear issue is how these fees are levied. For example, a friend of mine is on a tight budget and has been for a while. The trouble is, that when she gets hit for these fees they cause her to go overdrawn and thus generate more fees! It's like the banks have license to generate money whenever they want. Despite my friend ringing them constantly to try and get it sorted, they just tell her tough.
Exactly what happened in my case Lucio. With the cost of everything rising now What little I had at the end of the month their fee's took me past my threshold of my overdraft incurring excessive fee's which amounted to the figure I stated above.

As I've said, a little bit of flexibility would be great, but the banks just don't want to seem to know and in some cases I've heard of from others, can be very rude about it.
the charges are unfair - its quite simple - how much does it cost to send out an automated letter? £5 max. Yet they screw us out of £30 EACH time we go overdrawn (Most of which is down to the fact as pointed out them levieing high charges which force us into our overdrafts again).

And now they are threatening us with “we will be forced to end free banking” - let them - nothing in this world is free - lets see how they like it when we all desert them for the only one or two that do offer us free banking.

They make a killing off us consumers with millions (if not billions) announced in profits for the fat stakeholders EVERY year - when it comes to paying out - then they can't afford - poopookaka I say.
THe headline is HUGELY wrong, the decision today is nothing to do with whether the charges are unfair.

The decision today allows the OFT to decide if they are…… and if so by how much in a seperate case.

Then there will be two cases where the banks can stop it, one is the appeal of this one, where they will try and get the OFT stopped from looking into the fees at all.

The second will be where they look at how much the fees SHOULD be….


TiG