facebook rss twitter

Amazon vows to fight agency pricing

by Sarah Griffiths on 15 October 2010, 15:10

Tags: Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qa2kq

Add to My Vault: x

Amazon warrior?

Amazon UK has promised its Kindle customers that it will fight agency pricing to stop a possible hike in the price of e-books.

The retail giant has made its pledge to customers and asked publishers ‘not to needlessly impose price increases on consumers,' pointing out that publishers that have stuck with the agency model in the US have shifted less books than Amazon's preferred model, according to industry bible, The Bookseller.

The agency model means publishers set the price for their e-books and make all booksellers stick to them, arguably decreasing competition between retailers, which could result in cheaper prices for customers, unlike the traditional wholesale method that lets book sellers set the price of a book.

Amazon has reportedly revealed that publishers who have stuck with the agency model in the US have seen the rate of sales of its e-books drop, to ‘half the rate of growth of the rest of Kindle book sales'.

According to The Bookseller, Amazon sent out an email to its Kindle customers promising to try and keep prices low but could also perhaps be perceived to be declaring war on publishers in the process.

In the email, Amazon wrote that publishers sticking to the agency model: "will raise prices on e-books for consumers almost across the board. For a number of reasons, we think this is a damaging approach for readers, authors, booksellers and publishers alike."

A gaggle of US agency publishers including HarperCollins, Penguin and Macmillan have raised e-book prices and Amazon reportedly said: "we know that these increases have not only frustrated readers, but have caused booksellers, publishers and authors alike to lose sales."

However, the ‘majority' of e-books sold on the site still use the wholesale model. Amazon commented that there is a ‘significant difference' between sales of the two models, which will become increasingly important as up to the end of September it has reportedly sold "more than three times as many Kindle books in 2010 as we did up to the end of September in 2009."

In the email to customers, Amazon reportedly wrote: "In the UK, we will continue to fight against higher prices for e-books, and have been urging publishers considering agency not to needlessly impose price increases on consumers. In any case, we expect UK customers to enjoy low prices on the vast majority of titles we sell, and if faced with a small group of higher-priced agency titles, they will then decide for themselves how much they are willing to pay for e-books, and vote with their purchases."

Industry professionals believe the email will irk booksellers and worry UK publishers mulling whether to shift to the agency model.



HEXUS Forums :: 6 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
I'm fairly disappointed with the ebook situation in general really. I was desperately tempted to buy a Kindle, but as a history student it's absolutely no use to me.

Of the texts I've needed to buy, only one has been available on Kindle. And that single book was a whole 20p cheaper than the paperback (brand new). Are they honestly trying to tell me that raw materials, machinery, labour, factory space, multiple deliveries comes to a total of 20p? It's ridiculous.

If I wanted to read the Times every morning, and download every Dan Brown book to my e-reader within 8 seconds of it being released, then yeah, I'd have bought one buy now. But there are so many situations where it doesn't match up to expectations it's untrue.

There's a lot of money out there, I believe, for publishers if they take the right attitude to digital sales. The music industry is almost certainly benefitting, so why are they so backwards? If they start going down routes like this, things can only get worse.
I have so far read 2 books on kindle for android and while I enjoyed the books thoroughly there were a lot of typos and formatting problems.

Charging the same amount as you would pay for a hardcopy which, as stated previously must cost a lot more to produce and supply seems really daft to me.
Deleted
I'm fairly disappointed with the ebook situation in general really. I was desperately tempted to buy a Kindle, but as a history student it's absolutely no use to me.

Of the texts I've needed to buy, only one has been available on Kindle. And that single book was a whole 20p cheaper than the paperback (brand new). Are they honestly trying to tell me that raw materials, machinery, labour, factory space, multiple deliveries comes to a total of 20p? It's ridiculous.

Raw materials and the like are a fairly small component of the cost of a book. Most of the others are components paid for pretty solely by the retailer, and in the case of a warehouse retailer like Amazon, most of that is significantly diminished as well.

Strippable paperbacks are a rather interesting contrast, those small flappy books, poor binding that fun stuff. If the retailer in question doesn't sell those book in their release window, they don't get shipped back to the distributor or publisher. They just send back the cover, and destroy the rest. And get the full wholesale refund for it.

Now for history books, you are simply paying primarily for the interpretation, the same as other textbooks. So when you remove the physical component of the book, it doesn't really reduce the cost that much.
You honestly believe that all of that costs 20p?
Deleted
You honestly believe that all of that costs 20p?

It could do, especially if its produced and shipped in bulk. The majority of the value of the book is still in the content though. Plus if the retailer can get away with making more money off ebook sales, they'll do it; who wouldn't?