facebook rss twitter

HP gives up on mobile – what next for webOS?

by Scott Bicheno on 19 August 2011, 12:59

Tags: Hewlett Packard (NYSE:HPQ)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qa6xm

Add to My Vault: x

What now for webOS?

So the rather strange decision by HP to wash its hands of PCs and mobile before it had even come up with the best way to liquidate them is justified as paving the way for all possible avenues to be pursued. Now that it's all out in the open HP can talk to potential partners or acquirers without having to be surreptitious for fear of pesky journalists hearing about it and jumping to conclusions.

I won't dwell in the PC side of things, but clearly the other big PC players are the most obvious potential buyers. Dell seems more interested in B2B these days and Acer has more pressing matters to attend to, so that leaves Lenovo, Samsung and Apple as those who could most afford such a purchase and I think we can rule out the latter - that's just not Apple's style.

WebOS presents an intriguing proposition. The reason HP bought it is because mobile is so huge, and that's more apparent than ever now. The Googorola deal shows how exposed smartphone OEMs who don't have their own devices are. And you can be sure Samsung, HTC, etc would love to have a further alternative after Android and WP7.

But it's not as simple as, say, LG buying webOS and then saying ‘up yours' to Google and Microsoft, because it would inheret the same problem HP had been unable to solve: the developer Catch 22. Having said that, an established phone giant would offer webOS far greater retail exposure than Palm or HP could ever manage, but it would still be a hell of a high-risk strategy.

That risk would be diminished by merely licensing webOS from HP, rather than buying it, but that doesn't solve the problem of not owning your own platform and the limited control that entails. It's also by no means guaranteed that HP would continue to invest sufficiently in webOS to make it competitive.

So I think the most likely acquisition - and it probably won't be very expensive - will be by another tech giant. Apple and Google won't touch it - and probably wouldn't be allowed to by competition authorities anyway - although there might be a juicy patent angle to explore. Microsoft might be tempted, just to remove a competitor, but RIM has already committed to QNX.

In the mobile platform space that only really leaves one other: Intel. The last we heard it was still determined to make a go of MeeGo, and webOS is also Linux-based, so maybe it could combine the two and then offer it for free to encourage OEMs to give its mobile chips a go.

Another potential suitor being talked-about is Facebook. Counter-intuitive though it might seem, the same basic principle of owning your own mobile platform applies, and this would allow it to make a Facebook Phone. Given Facebook's current ubiquity on mobile devices, I can't see where the latent demand for such a thing is, but Facebook may consider a few hundred million dollars to be a small price to pay in order to find out.

For HP this represents a complete failure in mobile, but at least it's facing up to it. The Palm acquisition was, in part, designed to lessen HP's dependence on Microsoft, and it will now have some bridges to rebuild there. It would be a shame to see webOS, which generally gets nice reviews, disappear entirely, but if HP couldn't make it work, who can?

 



HEXUS Forums :: 9 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Lol dammit! There goes my only serious alternative to the Nokia N9.

Both WP7 and android now have heavyweight hardware vendors backing them, this makes it a dangerous business for Samsung et-al to rely on them as a third parties.

With HP ditching their low-margin consumer hardware business, WebOS for printers doesn't make much sense, so perhaps Samsung would like to buy WebOS?
Jedibeeftrix
With HP ditching their low-margin consumer hardware business, WebOS for printers doesn't make much sense, so perhaps Samsung would like to buy WebOS?
Sorry, I disagree here - webOS supposedly has very good multitasking in a small footprint - which (I would argue) makes it a good idea for middle to top-end MFP's. My current HP MFP is Android-based, and so a webOS one would be at least as good. More so for HP, since (at the moment) they own the OS.

As to webOS's longer-term future - I figure either it's going to die off as one of those ideas who didn't quite make it (e.g. Apple Newton), or HP'll be looking for a consortium effort - an arrangement like the Open Handset Alliance perhaps. I've got to wonder if this OS isn't a good possibility for all those folks currently shipping very low cost Android-based gear - especially if Microsoft, Apple, etc are hell-bent on suing the pants off anyone using Android.

Again, ScottB is arguably calling it right - it'll probably end up positioned in the same “embedded” space as MeeGo.
i'm not sure i'm saying what you think i'm saying, as the first paragraph doesn't appear to bear any relationship to anything that i wrote………?

the second paragraph is a perfectly possible outcome however. :)
Jedibeeftrix
i'm not sure i'm saying what you think i'm saying, as the first paragraph doesn't appear to bear any relationship to anything that i wrote………?
Oops - that's what comes of posting while on a (particularly boring) teleconf. :o What I thought you were saying was that webOS was unsuitable as an embedded OS - specifically for printers (seeing as this is one of the bits that HP's holding onto atm).

Rereading your post, I now see that you could've also being saying that HP couldn't justify holding onto webOS merely to use in it's printers. From what you said in the quoted post above I'm guessing that was the intended message … my bad :undecided

Just as long as there's some “fire sale” prices on Pre3 and TouchPad for employees… :mrgreen:
haha, no problem. :D