facebook rss twitter

Google’s acquisition of Motorola changes everything... again

by Scott Bicheno on 16 August 2011, 18:39

Tags: Google (NASDAQ:GOOG), Motorola (NYSE:MSI), Mubaloo

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qa6wm

Add to My Vault: x

Defragmentation

In the conference call yesterday Google was keen to stress how much growth potential it sees in Moto as a stand-alone business. This may be the case, but there are plenty of other profitable companies Google could have bought if it was in the conglomerate-building game, many of which would have been easier to incorporate.

Then again, given the hassle Google has had from anti-trust authorities with its last couple of major acquisitions, it may no longer be possible for Google to purchase online search and advertising companies anymore.

But the real reason, apart from patents, Google gave for the acquisition was to help it to improve the Android platform. This mainly entails dealing with its fragmentation problem. Offering a nominally free, open platform has enabled Android to grow incredibly quickly, but the situation with hardware specs and versions of Android is now such a mess that it's actively putting off some users and developers.

Now that Google owns an OEM, it can not only learn more about their needs and incorporate that into its Android strategy, it can also seed the market with new versions of Android via a hardware platform it has complete control over. A sort of Nexus programme on steroids.

There's one big problem with this laudable theory however: the other Android OEMs. It was said on the call that the lead-partner programme will remain competitive, but if part of the point of owning Moto is for Google to be able to have a hardware platform it controls, doesn't it defeat the object to then let a third-party release a new version into the wild?

On the flip-side, if Google continually favours Moto with early access to code and other goodies, that will put it at a massive competitive advantage over Samsung, HTC, etc, and presumably drive them away. It's hard to see how Google can have the best of both worlds here, but I still believe it will try, and the fact that Microsoft so clearly favours Nokia on WP7 will probably help them to stay loyal, for now, despite Microsoft's attempts to lure them away.

I believe the king-makers in the mobile platform war are developers. Without third-party developer support for the platform, mobile devices can't offer the range of attractive and useful apps end-users now demand from them. So to get a sense of the broader implication of this deal I spoke to Mark Mason, founder of app developer Mubaloo, to get his take.

"I think it will improve things as long as it helps sort out the fragmentation of Android, especially regarding the different versions and hardware specs," said Mason. "It also puts Google closer to the operators, which is a real advantage, especially when it comes to the access of data.

"Google has instantly turned itself into an Apple in the US, where it has 30 percent Android market share. Android OEMs have not been quick enough with Android, so Google wants to help out. I honestly think Google doesn't know everything about what this deal will do for them and they're probably running a bit scared of Apple too."

I suggested that if Google does too much to standardise Android handset specs that may result in the homogenization of the ecosystem and make it even harder for OEMs to differentiate their products. Mason agreed and said Google needs to look for the ideal balance.

To conclude I asked Mason which platforms his company is currently developing apps for. He revealed that their workload is around two fifths iOS, two fifths Android, and a fifth web apps. There's a bit of WP7 work, which he expects to grow once Nokia gets going, and HP has shown some interest in getting apps done for webOS.

I asked why BlackBerry isn't even on the list. "We feel very few people download apps for BlackBerry, and it's also not an easy platform to develop for," said Mason. "I really think BlackBerry has missed the boat and it will die a death."

He wasn't much more optimistic about webOS, and we agreed that the mainstream market can probably only support three platforms. This means that Android OEMs are left with very few alternatives - unless they want to get together and give MeeGo a spot of CPR - which ensures that they will have to tolerate Google's ownership of one of their competitors for the foreseeable future.

The general consensus seems to be that this deal changes everything, but nobody - even Google - knows what the precise implications of this deal will be, assuming regulators let it happen. The market seems to be consolidating around three platforms owned by three of the biggest tech players. This is probably a good thing for both competition and stability, but I'd be surprised if this was the last big acquisition in the mobile device space.

 



HEXUS Forums :: 15 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
I've been reading all the pundits theories and views on this for the last 2 days and it makes great reading. I think this is going to be a defining moment for Google and the mobile phone industry.

I think Google felt forced to purchase moto for whatever price they could. Moto saw it coming and took them to the cleaners. And fair play to them I bet there are some very happy share holders out there today.

I think the oddest thing about this is that Google have spent 1 and half years profit on Motorola. That's a very odd thing to do for Android. Something that is already I assume a losing proposition for them. I don't see a good business case for it? $12.5 billion more to earn seems a very large amount of searches.

It's very interesting seeing the battle between Apple/Google/Microsoft in the mobile sphere. They are all in it with completly different plans and reasons.

Google want bums on seats and don't care about OEM's profits
Apple want to make the good money and don't care about market share. Their customers are the end users.
Microsoft want to sell as many licenses as possible.

It's not a battle that we've ever seen before in the tech world.

Lets hope it benefits us customers in the end.
I think the oddest thing about this is that Google have spent 1 and half years profit on Motorola. That's a very odd thing to do for Android. Something that is already I assume a losing proposition for them. I don't see a good business case for it? $12.5 billion more to earn seems a very large amount of searches.

There's not only that, Motorola Mobility are actually making a loss too, so this acquisition is actually going to cost Google quite a lot of money. Something drastic needs to be done to make Motorola Mobility a profitable concern.
Most phone companies are struggling though…Nokia, SE and LG aren't actually posting decent results and haven't for years!
3dcandy
Most phone companies are struggling though…Nokia, SE and LG aren't actually posting decent results and haven't for years!

They also need to take drastic action too (and we know what that is for one of them). Could loss-making + Google's Motorola acquisition be enough to push SE and LG et al away from Android? The shareholders of these companies will be looking for whatever way they can to maximise profits, and it may come to a point where that means abandoning Android if it remains unprofitable.
mrochester
They also need to take drastic action too (and we know what that is for one of them). Could loss-making + Google's Motorola acquisition be enough to push SE and LG et al away from Android? The shareholders of these companies will be looking for whatever way they can to maximise profits, and it may come to a point where that means abandoning Android if it remains unprofitable.

…and go where?