facebook rss twitter

Apple ordered to lay off Kodak over patent infringement

by Alistair Lowe on 12 March 2012, 10:46

Tags: Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL), Kodak

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qabdsn

Add to My Vault: x

Sent to the naughty corner for kicking a man when he's down, Apple has been denied the right to launch a new patent infringement case and to continue existing cases against Kodak, where, as reported earlier, the firm is currently involved in Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.

Residing US Bankruptcy Judge, Allan Gropper, stated that although complaints needed to be sorted out in the near future, now was not the time and that it was vital to Kodak's emergence from bankruptcy protection, that the firm remain able to sell its intellectual property portfolio as a key part of the company's recovery strategy, "I would request that the parties report to me on their efforts to come up with a procedure that truly works," he stated.

Both firms have ongoing legal cases with each other pertaining to patents, with Kodak allegations of four patent infringements still within the system, whilst Apple allegations remain frozen, though previously the ITC did uphold a ruling that Kodak had not infringed on Apple's patents.

We can't help but wonder, just a little, how relieved the mobile industry might feel if firms were told that they had legal immunity against new Apple patent filings.



HEXUS Forums :: 7 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
As if Apple want money from this, its purely a game to get the patents that Kodak have, oh look you owe us 15 million, or we could just take your patent folder instead…
just Apple being Apple, it's been going on for ages….
Sometimes I wonder if Apple want to keep any friends at all….be good if no-one fabs them any chips shortly as I doubt they'd survive that for long
Both firms have ongoing legal cases with each other pertaining to patents, with Kodak allegations of four patent infringements still within the system, whilst Apple allegations remain frozen, though previously the ITC did uphold a ruling that Kodak had not infringed on Apple's patents.
Erm, unless I'm misreading the article, is it the case that Apple was trying to file new suit on the ITC had ruled “no foul” on? If so, then surely Apple's guilty of malicious prosecution, if not persecution of Kodak.
We can't help but wonder, just a little, how relieved the mobile industry might feel if firms were told that they had legal immunity against new Apple patent filings.
Ooh that'd be nice. Better still though if (a) Apple were coerced into allow FRAND terms on their proper patents, and (b) they (Apple) weren't allowed to file any more frivolous patents - someone at the weekend said that they were expecting an Apple patent on the smartphone concept, and was only half-joking when he said it.
The recent slide-to-unlock and phone-with-a-single-button legal cases were just nonsense imho.
'[GSV
Trig;2353017']As if Apple want money from this, its purely a game to get the patents that Kodak have, oh look you owe us 15 million, or we could just take your patent folder instead…
Oh, I'm sure they wouldn't do that, would they …? ;)
Imagine Apple's legal team with Kodak's patent portfolio as ammunition - ugh. :wallbash:
problem is though Apple have such financial clout from selling overpriced stuff these days it makes them able to buy legal wins…
And before I get flamed on this, have a trawl around the internet and it's awash with documented cases of Apple doing exactly this many times over. As already said, some of their patents are laughable, so laughable that other firms probably wouldn't have the balls to file them in the first place…
Yet another example of the ridiculous state of software patents