facebook rss twitter

Chancellor Osborne increases VAT to 20 per cent

by Tarinder Sandhu on 22 June 2010, 16:15

Tags: HEXUS, UK Government

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qaytm

Add to My Vault: x

He giveth and taketh

Chancellor George Osborne has delivered a Budget speech with a wide range of spending cuts and tax rises. Hoping to balance the books by 2016, Osbourne announced that value-added tax (VAT) would increase from 17.5 per cent to 20 per cent from January 4, 2011, generating an estimated £13bn for the Treasury's coffers.

VAT is relatively easy to charge and hard to avoid, making it an obvious candidate for a tax rise, but the implications are all too apparent for the technology industry, where many aspirational products have a high price elasticity of demand.   

Assuming that the VAT rises are passed directly on to the consumer, which is likely, a £300 product (£255.32 plus VAT) will cost £306.38, and £1,000 PC (£851.06 plus VAT) will come in at £1021.28.

On a positive note, council tax has been frozen for two years, personal income tax allowance will rise to £7,475 in April 2011, and public-sector workers earning less than £21,000 per year will receive a flat pay-rise of £250 per year for two years.

Your thoughts, as always, are very welcome in the HEXUS.community.


HEXUS Forums :: 19 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Comes as no surprise considering the state of the economy.

Harsh times ahead.
#&?$%! :surrender:
My overall response to the budget was ‘meh’

Probably a good thing and suggests he's probably pitched it about right.
At the end of the day people will moan because it effects them, what they dont care about is the state of the country..
The opposition will slag the budget off.
People will moan.

tbh if they have worked the figures out properly and the country is debt free by 2016 then I dont mind, everyone seem to be selfish about it but dont seem to get that its for the good of the country.
Harsh times yes but if it were a family that were in a similar state then they would have to make cuts so it makes sence to me for the country to do the same..
Facebook put the UK populous into perspective:

**** ***** “'Unemployed people will see their Housing Benefit cut by 10%, after 12
months of claiming Jobseekers Allowance from April 2013.

' << ****ers!” "

#facepalm#

It would help if 60% of those people weren't just trying to scrounge off the state in the first place, they should have it cut to 10%, not by 10%… (i'm talking long term unemployed who're fully capable of working)

20% of them are actually trying their damnedest to find work and should be supported to the full extent…

20% are at-least attempting to find work and should be helped out…

Take the money off the feckless and put it back into the hands of the decent folk (easier said than done, i know…)


How have we got into a state where sponging off everyone else's hard work is acceptable?




*this post contains made up percentages ;)*