facebook rss twitter

Oracle and Autonomy CEOs in public cat-fight

by Scott Bicheno on 30 September 2011, 11:48

Tags: Oracle (NASDAQ:ORCL), Hewlett Packard (NYSE:HPQ)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qa7hs

Add to My Vault: x

Growl, hiss!

Top CEOs didn't get where they are today by reining in their egos, and one of the biggest - in both senses - has been beating his chest in public once more.

It's no secret that Oracle boss Larry Ellison has little affection for HP. The animosity was probably catalysed by one of its main hardware partners deciding to go big on software and services itself, with the acquisition of companies such as EDS. But it got personal when the HP board messed with Ellison's mate - Mark Hurd - last year.

 Since then Ellison had taken Hurd on himself and wasted little time in laying into is replacement - Leo Apotheker. Now that he too is gone,  the clearly bored Ellison has retrained his sights onto Mike Lynch - the CEO of UK database giant Autonomy, which HP is acquiring - in what seems to be a proxy attack on HP.

The point Ellison seems to be trying to hammer home is that HP is overpaying for Autonomy. The proof of this is a claimed meeting between Lynch and Hurd earlier this year at which Ellison claims Lynch tried to flog his company to Oracle, but failed because the $6 billion asking price was deemed too high. HP is paying almost twice that.

There then followed a public dispute between the two, which is neatly summarised in the graphic below, taken from a recent WSJ summary of the spat. Oracle has even issued a really mature press release entitled "Another Whopper from Autonomy CEO Mike Lynch", and has set up a dedicated website which hosts a presentation Oracle claims proves Lynch was trying to sell.



Autonomy recently briefed the Guardian on the matter, saying Oracle is trying to divert attention away from its own ignorance in the area of unstructured data - Autonomy's speciality. It concludes with this witty retort: "Oracle seems a little confused about the sequence of events and origins of the data it has received, something that would suggests [sic] it needs better management of and insight into the unstructured data on its internal systems. We would be delighted to help."

Just as we were thinking this is shaping up to be a juicy little cat-fight, we suddenly realised we didn't care. HP wants to compete with Oracle, Larry - get over it. If, in order to do so, it's over-paying for Autonomy then the only losers are HP's shareholders, who have little reason to be cheerful regardless.


HEXUS Forums :: 2 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
The point Ellison seems to be trying to hammer home is that HP is overpaying for Autonomy.
So the next WSJ headline will presumably be "Ellison shocked by the defecatory habits of woodland-dwelling bears"? :rolleyes:

Everyone knows that HP over paid for Autonomy and it - along with the farcical way PSG was mis-spun - was the reason that LA got his marching orders.

What amuses me is that “St Larry” should be so hacked off by it - as Scott B points out, if one of your competitors “screws the pooch” then surely that's an occasion for some well-deserved mirth and finger-pointing? Leads me to wonder if maybe LA's purchase of Autonomy wasn't as coyote-crazy as I first thought.

Wonder if we'll see HP continue Autonomy's shirt sponsorship of Spurs football club (http://www.tottenhamhotspur.com/news/articles/tottenham-hotspur-announces-new-shirt-sponsorship-with-Autonomy-080710.html)?
Wonder if we'll see HP continue Autonomy's shirt sponsorship of Spurs football club (http://www.tottenhamhotspur.com/news/articles/tottenham-hotspur-announces-new-shirt-sponsorship-with-Autonomy-080710.html)?

As a Spurs fan I can confirm the sponsorship works. As soon as I saw Autonomy on the shirt I had an irresistible urge to buy some unstructured database products.