facebook rss twitter

Samsung was the clear leader in SSD shipments last year

by Mark Tyson on 22 April 2015, 11:05

Tags: Samsung (005935.KS), Intel (NASDAQ:INTC)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qacqvi

Add to My Vault: x

Samsung is the clear leader in the SSD storage market according to new industry statistics published by IHS (via ZDNet). Last year 34 per cent of all SSDs sold were Samsung branded units. The South Korean electronics giant soundly beat second place Intel by generating twice the revenue from its SSD sales: it brought in $3.99 billion, compared to Intel's $1.99 billion SSD revenue.

SSD products made by Samsung are undoubtedly popular with HEXUS readers. Its consumer and Pro targeted drives have garnered good HEXUS reviews offering users an almost irresistible mix of good performance and competitive pricing.

The use of cutting edge technology in its products also helps with the popularity of the brand. At the end of 2014 Samsung brought out the first consumer 3D V-NAND SSD drives, which feature vertically stacked flash memory providing greater capacities without significant device size increase. At the beginning of this year it introduced M.2 form factor SSDs offering 30 per cent faster data transfers and 50 per cent better energy efficiency than the previous generation.

IHS has made some predictions about what lies ahead for the SSD industry, as you can see in the chart above (2015e and 2016e). The SSD market is expected to grow moderately over the next couple of years from $11.58 billion last year to $14.13 billion in 2016. Meanwhile the market shares of the top five players, Samsung, Intel, Sandisk, Micron and Toshiba, are predicted to hardly flinch.

Samsung's semiconductor business is widely considered to be on a roll, winning orders from many sides. For example Re/Code recently reported that Samsung's foundries will be put to work making Qualcomm's next high-end chip.

In another business thread its smartphone rollercoaster seemed to have crashed to a grinding halt during the year of the Samsung Galaxy S5. However recent reports are saying that Samsung expects the Galaxy S6 and Galaxy S6 Edge smartphones to be the "biggest-sellers in the Galaxy series ever". Sales of over 70 million units are looking likely after positive public responses, excellent pre-order numbers and gauging the first weeks of retail availability.



HEXUS Forums :: 10 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Despite the fact that what, say at least 50% of these SSD's (yes, I am looking at you EVO 840) shipped with borked firmware and serious design flaws…..

Wonder how a customer satisfaction survey would stack up against their “super-duper” success story

J
jinjur
Despite the fact that what, say at least 50% of these SSD's (yes, I am looking at you EVO 840) shipped with borked firmware and serious design flaws…..

Wonder how a customer satisfaction survey would stack up against their “super-duper” success story

J

As far as I understand, the 840 evo was the only model affected. Last year I bought an 850 pro and an 840 evo and both are still working well slightly over a year later. It's just sad that tech review sites can't find these flaws before the reviews are published.
jinjur
Despite the fact that what, say at least 50% of these SSD's (yes, I am looking at you EVO 840) shipped with borked firmware and serious design flaws…..
I think you're over-reacting a bit. Yes, the 840 EVO had firmware revisions that didn't perform that well after a while, and Samsung didn't exactly cover themselves in glory by issuing a fix, then a fix for that fix.

Apart from the read/perf firmware fiasco, the EVO's seem to have been received quite well. And the two I've got (120GB and 500GB for OS and apps respectively) perform well enough that I've no complaints. The Anandtech article that I read last year said:
Anandtech
The EVO has been the most popular retail SSD so far, so it's great to see Samsung providing a fix in such a short time. None of the big SSD manufacturers have been able to avoid widespread bugs (remember the 8MB bug in the Intel SSD 320 and the 5,000-hour bug in the Crucial m4?) and I have to give Samsung credit for handling this well. In the end, this bug never resulted in data loss, so it was more of an annoyance than a real threat.

As to “serious design flaws”, a quick Google search didn't throw up anything of that nature. So care to share?
jinjur
Wonder how a customer satisfaction survey would stack up against their “super-duper” success story
100% satisfied customer of the 830 (non-Pro) units and the two 840EVO's seem to be okay. Although, even I'd knock off some marks for (a) having big scary warning on the firmware updater that doing this will erase the drive (other people have told me that it doesn't actually) and (b) the afore-mentioned less-than-professional handling of the read firmware bug.

Would I buy an 850EVO or 850Pro - probably. If not them, then probably something from Crucial or Sandisk - I like the idea that the device maker is using their own flash.

Now, if you wanted a customer satisfaction survey for Windows, on the other hand, then I'll get the poison pen out. ;)
I bought an 850 Pro to replace an ageing Crucial M4 and I must say it's very fast, the Samsung Magician toolbox is the industry leader IMHO, RAPID mode does make a difference and the optimisation checks and one click over-provisioning are great features for people who wouldn't know how do those things otherwise.

The 840 Evo has some issues and I'm rather put off TLC NAND because of that at the moment, when it comes to cheaper drives I'm mostly buying Crucial BX/MX but must test the 840 Evo in my work PC actually.
As someone who has 2 x 250GB 830s and had 2 x 64GB <insert name of first gen drives!> that are still working fine in other peoples systems, I wouldn't think too hard before buying another Sammy SSD….

Although saying that, if it wasn't for the 840EVO issues, I wouldn't have even thought about it. That has sewn a seed of doubt in my mind and after using my brothers MX100 recently, I might look at crucial if I was looking for another cheap SSD, although I have also been very happy with my 4 x 250GB Corsair Force 3 drives, which were a gamble when I purchased them due to the Sandforce controller in them (got them for £105 each when 250GB SSDs were ~£150), although they have been rock solid and even spent a while as a RAID5 array…..

Bottom line, as with all purchases you take your chances!

I do feel that some companies have fallen foul of their own success by reducing QC to get stuff out faster, maybe Samsung are guilty of that here, who knows?