vacancies advertise contact news tip The Vault
facebook rss twitter

UK and US governments warn against using ZTE hardware

by Mark Tyson on 17 April 2018, 14:01

Tags: ZTE

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qadsrk

Add to My Vault: x

UK and US government agencies have warned telecoms companies not to use ZTE hardware. In the UK the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) issued a statement about its concerns, and across the pond the US Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security has acted with immediate effect to bar ZTE imports for 7 years. The government agencies are worried about the Chinese state owned ZTE Corp’s equipment as potential risks to national security.

In the UK Dr. Ian Levy, Technical Director at the NCSC, is writing to telecoms companies with advice regarding the use of ZTE equipment. “It is entirely appropriate and part of NCSC’s duty to highlight potential risks to the UK’s national security and provide advice based on our technical expertise,” said Dr Levy. “NCSC assess that the national security risks arising from the use of ZTE equipment or services within the context of the existing UK telecommunications infrastructure cannot be mitigated.”

It is notable that BT formed an R&D partnership with ZTE back in 2011 and has distributed modems containing ZTE hardware. With regard of the new government agency backed statements, BT asserts that it has “a robust testing regime in place,” to ensure network security.

Over in the USA the government Department of Commerce has imposed a denial of export privileges order on ZTE. Rather than this being solely about network security of firms operating in the US, this is more of a punishment measure against ZTE for illegally shipping telecommunications equipment to Iran and North Korea, making false statements, obstructing justice, and misleading investigators. “ZTE misled the Department of Commerce. Instead of reprimanding ZTE staff and senior management, ZTE rewarded them. This egregious behaviour cannot be ignored,” Department of Commerce Secretary Ross explained.

On the US side of things, home companies will no longer be able to sell components to ZTE. This will have a large impact on Qualcomm, which supplies smartphone processors to the Chinese company.

ZTE suspended trading in Hong Kong and Shenzhen on Tuesday, as it assesses the developing situation and implications to its business.

Point to ponder: The UK government seems more worried about ZTE modems than the state-owned China General Nuclear Power Corporation (CGN) constructing nuclear plants around England. What if those facilities were to use ZTE networking equipment?



HEXUS Forums :: 26 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
And which non Chinese built item should we use instead…considering most of my electronics items have ‘built in china’ on the packaging I'm sure they could find another way in….

There's not many electronic items not built in places like china these days.
…..Behind the scenes you might find its Cisco, Apple, IBM and many other American companies are pushing for such a legislation and why? because Chinese companies are producing affordable but competitive products and are becoming a threat to their market share.
LSG501
And which non Chinese built item should we use instead…considering most of my electronics items have ‘built in china’ on the packaging I'm sure they could find another way in….

There's not many electronic items not built in places like china these days.

Think you'd be surprised by how much of our electronics *isn't* produced in China. A huge portion is from Taiwan and they aren't exactly on great terms with China politically speaking. Another huge supplier is, ofc, Korea.
Luke7
Think you'd be surprised by how much of our electronics *isn't* produced in China. A huge portion is from Taiwan and they aren't exactly on great terms with China politically speaking. Another huge supplier is, ofc, Korea.

Taiwanese firms like Foxconn have factories in China though.
lumireleon
because Chinese companies are producing affordable but competitive products and are becoming a threat to their market share.
Or in other words, producing reverse engineered inferior copies where they save on R&D and dont care about quality so can sell for less

And any Chinese company you may care to list that does have some quality now, is very (very) likely to drop in quality in the future and produce crap like the rest of them, simply because they can and easily get away with it