facebook rss twitter

Review: Shuttle XPC SB62G2 SFF PC

by Tarinder Sandhu on 20 November 2003, 00:00

Tags: Shuttle

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qaub

Add to My Vault: x

System setups, notes and O/C

Here's a quick rundown of the test system should you wish to compare benchmark results with your own.
  • AMD Athlon 64 3200+ Clawhammer CPU. RAM running with an 10 divisor (DDR400, single channel)
  • Intel Pentium 4 3.2GHz ES 800FSB CPU
  • AMD Barton XP3200+ S462 CPU (2200MHz / 200FSB)
  •  
  • Shuttle SB62G2 XPC SFF platform with FB62 motherboard
  • Shuttle SN85G4 XPC SFF platform with FN85 nForce3 150 motherboard
  • ABIT IC7-MAX3 i875P Canterwood (21/08/03 BIOS) for the 3.2GHz 800FSB P4
  • EPoX 8RDA3G nForce2 Ultra 400 for the XP3200+ Barton

Other components

  • ATi Radeon 9800 Pro (380/340)
  • 2 x 256MB Corsair XMS3500C2, run at 2-6-2-2 @ DDR400 for all. Single-channel running on the SN85G4. Run with 'Enhanced' on the IC7-MAX3
  • Toshiba 8x DVD
  • Samcheer 420w PSU
  • Dell P991 19" monitor
  • AMD reference S940 / S754 cooler
  • Akasa Silver Mountain cooler
  • Thermaltake AX478 cooler with a 25CFM fan

Software

  • Windows XP Professional SP1
  • DirectX9.0a
  • Intel 5.00.1015 chipset drivers
  • NVIDIA nForce2 2.45 drivers
  • ATI CATALYST 3.7 drivers and control panel (6378s)
  • Pifast v41 to 10m places
  • Lame v3.92 MP3 encoding with Razor-Lame 1.15 front-end using U2's Pop album (611MB)
  • XMPEG v5.02 and DivX 5.05 Pro
  • Kribi Bench 1.19
  • ScienceMark 2.0
  • Realstorm Raytracing benchmark 320x180x32
  • 3DMark 2001SE v330
  • UT2003 Retail (Build 2225)
  • X2: The Threat - Rolling Demo
  • Comanche 4 benchmark
  • Serious Sam 2: Sierra De Chiapas Demo.
  • Quake 3 v1.30 HQ

Notes

The SB62G2 installed Windows XP and functioned perfectly first time. SATA drives ran at the expected speeds and everything was, well, hunky-dory. It was run with a discrete ATi Radeon 9800 PRO graphics card and with the memory-sapping on-board graphics. Image quality is a very subjective matter. What appears great to one pair of eyes is merely acceptable to another. The added complication of comparing 2D quality from two sources makes it an even more subjective issue.

ATI's range of cards are well-known for their 2D / 3D quality, and with a Radeon 9800 PRO the SB62G2's 2D output at 1024x768x32 120Hz was crisp, clear and a pleasure to use. The same cannot be said for Intel's Extreme Graphics 2 image quality. It's quite difficult to get across the differences that exist between the two. Words alone, I feel, don't quite convey the how both sets of video is outputted on a Dell 19" flat-faced Trinitron monitor.



What I've sought to do is to take 2 shots with a digital camera that I believe to be indicative of image quality.

Box shot Box shot

The image on the left is from the 9800 PRO's HD15 output. The image on the right is from the on-board graphics. If anything, the images perhaps don't show the true nature of 2D quality difference. Notice how the text is sharper on the left. That's how, subjectively speaking, it appears when viewing it on-screen. Intel's on-board graphics provide for a substandard viewing experience. That's enough reason to invest in a low-end graphics card. The SB62G2's lack of S-Video output doesn't endear the Extreme Graphics 2 solution to many users either

The 3.2GHz P4 / Springdale i865G-powered SB62G2 will be compared to an AMD Athlon XP3200+ (Barton) / nForce2 Ultra pairing, Shuttle's very own SN85G4 AMD Athlon 3200+ / nForce3 150, and the ABIT IC7-MAX3 / 3.2GHz combination. The SB62G2 will be run with a discrete Radeon 9800 PRO and the on-board graphics option. Initial overclocking tests showed promise. The SB62G2 was able to run at 240FSB without problems

The running speed of the protagonists were as follows:

3208.2MHz - P4 3.2GHz / ABIT IC7-MAX3 (Canterwood)

3207.7MHz - P4 3.2GHz / SB62G2 (Springdale i865G)

2205.1MHz - Athlon XP3200+ / EPoX 8RDA3G (nForce2 Ultra 400)

1999.8MHz - Athlon 64 3200+ / SN85G4 (nForce3 150)