facebook rss twitter

Review: £600-£700 to spend on a PC base unit? MESH and ARBICO battle for top honours

by Tarinder Sandhu on 20 July 2009, 09:35 3.5

Tags: MESH MATRIX II 550BE, ARBICO OC 2695 XL, MESH Computers, Arbico

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qas26

Add to My Vault: x

GPU and power-draw

3DMark Vantage Overall Extreme
MESH MATRIX II 550BEARBICO OC 2695 XL
45334690


3DMark Vantage's Extreme test takes place at 1,920x1,200 with 4xAA 16xAF. The benchmark is just a touch faster on the ARBICO - the test is card-limited for the most part.

Enemy Territory: Quake Wars (high-end) 1,680x1,050 4xAA 16xAF
MESH MATRIX II 550BEARBICO OC 2695 XL
86.892.5


Enemy Territory: Quake Wars (high-end) 1,920x1,200 4xAA 16xAF
MESH MATRIX II 550BEARBICO OC 2695 XL
77.876.7


Radeon HD 4890 XT and GeForce GTX 260 are about the same speed in Enemy Territory - a situation that's shown here.

Power consumption - idle
MESH MATRIX II 550BEARBICO OC 2695 XL
148106


Power-draw is interesting. At idle, defined as the system idling in Vista, the MESH actually draws an additional 42W over the overclocked, overvolted Core 2 Quad.

Power consumption - load (3D)
MESH MATRIX II 550BEARBICO OC 2695 XL
284305


Load them up with half the cores set to Prime95 Torture test and the other half helping to run Enemy Territory at 1,680x1,050, we see that the ARBICO begins to show its juice-hungry credentials.

Performance summary

Applications that require CPU grunt are best-run on the ARBICO, with the large assumption that they're multi-threaded in nature. For everyday tasks, though, the Phenom II X2 550BE is more than adequate.

Gaming credentials are similar on both systems, but idle power-draw is markedly different, being some 40W lower on the quad-core-totin' ARBICO.