facebook rss twitter

Corsair Flash Voyager GT 128 USB pen-drive review.

by Tarinder Sandhu on 28 August 2009, 05:00 3.25

Tags: Flash Voyager GT 128, Corsair

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qatmt

Add to My Vault: x

How we test

Setup

Storage drive Corsair Flash Voyager GT 128 Patriot Xporter Magnum Corsair Flash Voyager GT Samsung  HM161JJ 2.5in eSATA and USB Corsair X128 SSD (e)SATA
Drive capacity 128GB 128GB 8GB 160GB 128GB
Approx. price at time of writing £299 £290 £15
£37 (£15 for caddy) £298 (£15 for caddy)
Approx price per GB 2.396
2.265
1.875
0.231
2.328
CPU Intel Core 2 Duo E6700 (2.67GHz)
Motherboard Foxconn P45 Digital Life
BIOS revision P03
Memory 4GB Corsair DDR2-1,066
Host hard drive Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB
Graphics Card Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 512MB
Mainboard software Intel 9.1.1.1015
Graphics driver Catalyst 9.7
PSU Corsair HX1000
Operating System Windows 7 RC, 64-bit

Tests

2D benchmarks CrystalDiskMark 2.2.0m
6.15GB large-file read and write test
123MB small-file read and write test

Setup notes

To give some idea of performance, we're comparing the Corsair Flash Voyager GT 128 to a same-sized Xporter Magnum, alongside a smaller-capacity, speedy Corsair Voyager GT 8GB pen-drive. The comparison will show whether the dual-channel controller and capacity make a significant difference.

2.5in mechanical drives can also be used for on-the-go storage. A Samsung 160GB, 7,200rpm SATA drive's power credentials are low enough to be host-powered when driven by USB from an Akasa USB/eSATA caddy. We've also conducted tests via the faster eSATA interface, requiring attaching a USB plug to a power point on the caddy.

However, the rise of SSDs now means that a decent-performing 128GB model - a Corsair X128 in this case - can be purchased for the same money. This is connected via both eSATA and straight SATA for speedy transfers, as a best-case scenario. However, the branding on the drive is almost irrelevant as a number of manufacturers etail the same basic SSD. Patriot's Torqx 128GB is ostensibly the same model, as is the OCZ Vertex, Crucial M225, and G.Skill Falcon.

CrystalDiskMark provides throughput data based on sequential reads and writes, and random (512KB/4KB) reads and writes. We've used the default 100MB file-size for the tests.

In terms of real-world benchmarks, we time how long it take to transfer two sets of files to and from a Seagate 7200.11 500GB drive equipped with Windows 7 RC. The large-file tests include two movies that total 6.15GB. The small-file test is the expanded CINEBENCH R10 benchmark folder that's 123MB in size but has 1,971 files, ranging from 26.5MB down to 1,600 or so files that are 4KB, or smaller. We appreciate that the host drive may prove to be a bottleneck in this case, yet it does represent a real-world scenario.