facebook rss twitter

Review: Synology Disk Station DS508: the NAS that has it all?

by Michael Harries on 28 July 2008, 08:36

Tags: Synology

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qaohe

Add to My Vault: x

System setup and noted issues

Synology Disk Station DS508 performance

We used Iometer version 2006.07.27 over SMB shares. We equipped the DS508 with five 500GiB Seagate ST3500320AS drives, although, due to an oversight, we didn't remove the jumpers to set the drives to operate at 3Gbps, running at SATA1 speeds of 1.5Gbps.

The DS508's performance is tested in three states - a five-disk RAID5 array, a degraded array when one of the hard disks (disk two) is pulled from the system, and during the rebuild process after a disk is reinserted.

Setup

The host machine for Iometer is as follows:

Component Details
CPU Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770 (3.2GHz, 1,600MHz FSB)
Motherboard eVGA 132 CK-NF79 (NVIDIA nForce 790i Ultra SLI chipset) - nforce 15.17
Memory 2GiB (2x 1GiB) Corsair 1,066MHz DDR3 (CM3X-1024-1066C7)
Disks Seagate 160GB SATAII (ST3160812AS)
Graphics Sapphire Radeon HD3450 512MiB - CATALYST 8.6
Network NVIDIA network controller, 1Gbps, 9000byte frames
OS Microsoft Windows XP SP3

Below is our Iometer test regime:

Option/test Configuration
Outstanding I/Os 10
Individual test run time 30 seconds
Test file 1GB
Sequential read test access spec 64K transfers
100% sequential
100% read
Sequential write test access spec 64K transfers
100% sequential
100% write
Random read and write access spec 64KB transfers
100% random
50% write, 50% read
1MB Sequential read test access spec 1MB transfers
100% sequential
100% read

We found that results between results were somewhat inconsistent, necessitating six runs per test, up from the usual three. We then took the three most consistent runs (out of the six) to calculate an average speed. Even then, there was a less-than-ideal level of variance, and this should be taken into account when looking at the results.

Issues

It wasn't all smooth sailing with the Synology Disk Station DS508. We had two disks crash simultaneously during a rebuild, despite the disks only being a few days old. The only guidance the user manual could offer for fixing a crashed-disk problem was to hot-swap the crashed drives for new ones.

As two disks had shown as failed, we couldn't simply repair the RAID5 array. Removing the volume, and removing and replacing the 'crashed' disks allowed us to build a new RAID5 array using the same disks, even though there were initially some issues in having the disks initialise. The second rebuild took three hours.

A rebuild after removing and replacing disk two took just under three hours - the same as for the initial build.

A search of Synology's site leads to a number of threads where users have experienced similar problems; some believe the issue to be related to HDD hibernation settings when large disks are used.Ā 

Searching Synology's compatibility information there is no confirmation of support (or issues) for our ST3500320AS drives, even though there are listed issues for these drives in other Synology products. We disabled the hibernation feature and, hopefully, the issue will not rear its head again. Not being to enable power saving is clearly unacceptable, however.