facebook rss twitter

Review: Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB DDR4-3200

by Tarinder Sandhu on 5 August 2015, 16:00

Tags: Corsair

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qactil

Add to My Vault: x

Testing Methodology

Comparison Memory

  Corsair Vengeance LPX 3,200
Corsair Vengeance LPX 2,133
Model
CMK16GX4M4B3200C16
CMK16GX4M4A2133C13
Capacity
16GB (4x4GB)
8GB (2x4GB)
Speed
3,200MHz
2,133MHz
Timings
16-18-18-36-2T
15-15-15-35-2T
Voltage
1.35V
1.20V
Price*
£140
£110
Cost per GB*
£8.75
£6.87
*Approximate, correct at time of writing

Test Platform

CPU Intel Core i7-6700K
Motherboard Asus Z170-K (0323 BIOS)
Storage Device SK hynix Canvas SC300 512GB
Graphics Card Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 4GB
Power Supply Corsair AX760i
Operating System Windows 10 64-bit

Benchmarks

HEXUS.PiFast Our number-crunching benchmark stresses a single core by calculating Pi to 10m places
CINEBENCH R15 Using Cinebench's multi-CPU render, this cross-platform benchmark stresses all cores
HandBrake 0.10.2 Free-to-use video encoder that stresses all CPU cores (64-bit)
wPrime 2.1.0 Another number-crunching benchmark that stresses all available CPU cores/threads
AIDA64 v5.30.3500 Memory analysis tool supporting Skylake CPUs
3DMark DX11, Fire Strike default test
Grand Theft Auto V DX11, 1,920x1,080, very high quality (GTX 980) and normal quality (IGP)
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor DX11, 1,920x1,080, ultra quality (GTX 980) and low quality (IGP)
Total War: Rome II DX11, 1,920x1,080, extreme quality (GTX 980) and medium quality (IGP)

Notes

The simplest way to examine the effect of memory speed and timings is to look at the relative performance of the 2,133MHz and 3,200MHz kits.

Overclocking

We've chosen three arbitrary speeds and timings in order to evaluate the overclocking potential of the Corsair modules. Voltage was increased to 1.45V.

  3,333MHz
(16-18-18-36-2T)
3,400MHz
(16-18-18-36-2T)
3,400MHz
(17-17-17-39-2T)
Corsair @ 1.45V

Jumping up to 3,333MHz is easy at the specified timings but going any higher is problematic. The precise reason for this is unknown - it could be due to a memory ceiling or inability of the integrated memory controller on the Core i7-6700K to service higher speeds.