facebook rss twitter

Review: Corsair TwinX1024 3200XLPRO Memory

by Tarinder Sandhu on 11 June 2004, 00:00

Tags: Corsair

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qayr

Add to My Vault: x

System setup and notes

Here's a quick rundown of the test system should you wish to compare benchmark results with your own.
  • Corsair TwinX-3200XLPRO 1GB (2x512MB) (2-2-2-5)
  • Corsair 3200LL 1GB (2x512MB) (2-3-2-6)
  • Corsair 3500C2 512MB (2x256MB) (2-3-3-7)

Other components

  • AMD Athlon 64 Model 3800+ CPU (2.4GHz- S939)
  • ASUS A8V Deluxe S939 VIA K8T800 Pro motherboard
  • ASUS Radeon 9800 XT (412/730)
  • Pioneer 105 DVD-RW
  • Western Digital 160GB (WD1600) 8MB cache hard drive
  • Dell P991 19" monitor

Software

  • Windows XP Professional SP1
  • DirectX 9.0b
  • VIA 4.51 Hyperion driver set
  • ATI CATALYST 4.1 drivers and control panel
  • Pifast v4.1 to 10m places
  • ScienceMark 2.0
  • 3DMark 2001SE v330
  • UT2003 Retail (Build 2225)
  • Quake 3 v1.30 HQ
Notes

We'll be comparing the TwinX-3200XLPRO's performance against another 1GB of Corsair's low-latency memory and 512MB of XMS3500C2. We want to see just what kind of benefit timings of 2-2-2-5 confer over the 3200LL's 2-3-2-6 and the 3500C2's 2-3-3-7 timings. We're also keen to see if 1GB packs fare better than 512MBs, and we'll also be using a cutting-edge Athlon 64 platform for testing.



Memtest86 highlighted no errors at specified speed and voltage, albeit with initial testing undertaken using an i865PE motherboard.



Corsair's Plug-n-Frag SPD timings were applied correctly by both motherboards. There were no stability issues during testing. That's impressive going from ICs that have default parameters of DDR500 3-3-4-8.

On to the benchmarks.