facebook rss twitter

Review: Gigabyte Z170-Gaming K3

by Tarinder Sandhu on 2 March 2016, 13:20

Tags: Gigabyte (TPE:2376)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qacyzr

Add to My Vault: x

Testing Methodology

Comparison Motherboard Configurations

Gigabyte Z170 Gaming K3
MSI Z170A Tomahawk
Asus Z170-K
Chipset Revision
Intel Z170 (Intel driver)
Intel Core i7-6700K
Crucial Ballistix Sport LT 16GB (2x8GB)
Memory Timings
15-15-15-36-2T @ 2,133MHz
Discrete Graphics
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 (353.62)
System Drive
SK hynix Canvas SC300 (512GB)
Corsair Graphite 600T
Power Supply
Corsair AX760i
Operating System
Windows 10 (64-bit)

CPU and Memory Benchmarks

HEXUS PiFast Our number-crunching benchmark stresses a single core by calculating Pi to 10m places
Cinebench R15 Using Cinebench's multi-CPU render, this cross-platform benchmark stresses all cores
Handbrake Free-to-use video encoder that stresses all CPU cores (64-bit)

Gaming Benchmarks

Grand Theft Auto V DX11, 1,920x1,080, very high quality
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor DX11, 1,920x1,080, ultra quality
Total War: Rome II DX11, 1,920x1,080, ultra quality

Miscellaneous Benchmarks

Overclocking and Power Maximum CPU and memory frequencies, plus power consumption when gaming


We've historically had a large number of benchmarks detailing performance between chipsets. Due to the levels of integration in the processor practically all modern motherboards benchmark at the same levels, give or take a per cent or two, so 15 graphs showing near-identical performance isn't what you (or we) want to see.

We're running nine benchmarks - three CPU, three gaming, three storage - to see if the boards perform at the expected levels. This is more of a sanity check than anything else. Of rather more importance is how well the board(s) are able to overclock the CPU and DDR4 memory.

The line-up includes a couple of boards also targetting the crucial £100 segment. Let's see how Gigabyte does.