HEXUS.bang4buck, overclocking, temperature musings
Going back to comparing the XFX with its midrange competition.
HEXUS.bang4buck
| Graphics cards | XFX GeForce 8600 GTS XXX | ECS N8600GTS 256MX+ | Inno3D XStriker3 256MB | XFX GeForce 8600 GT XXX | Inno3D iChiLL 7900GS Arctic Cooling Silencer 6 | ASUS Radeon EAX1950PRO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual aggregate marks at 1280x1024 4xAA 8xAF | 204.18 | 196.54 | 190.6 | 169.17 | 263.87 | 230.31 |
| Aggregate marks, normalised*, at 1280x1024 | 192.09 | 186.64 | 181.25 | 157.33 | 221.94 | 205.16 |
| Current price | £160 | £145 | £135 | £110 | £101 | £99 |
| HEXUS.bang4buck score | 1.2 | 1.287 | 1.34 | 1.43 | 2.2 | 2.07 |
| Acceptable framerate (Av. 60FPS) at 1280x1024 4xAA 8xAF | Yes | No (SC) | No (SC.FC) | No (SC, FC) | Yes | Yes |
* - The normalisation refers to taking playable framerate into account. Should a card benchmark at over 60FPS in any one game, the extra FPS counts as half. Similarly, should a card benchmark lower, say at 40FPS, we deduct half the difference from its average framerate and the desired 60FPS, giving it a bang4buck score of 30 marks. The minimum framerate, then, can be 20FPS, as that will score 0.
As an example, should a card score 120FPS we count it as 90FPS (120 - (120-60)/2) as only half the framerate above 60FPS is counted for the bang4buck. Similarly, should it score 30FPS we count it as only 15FPS (30 + (30-60)/2).
The reasoning behind such calculation lies with playable framerates. Should card A score 110FPS in a benchmark and card B 160, then card B would normally receive an extra 50 marks in our bang4buck assessment, even though both cards produce perfectly playable framerates and anything above 60FPS is a bonus and not a necessity for most. However, the bang4buck total would be identical if in another benchmark card A scored a smooth 70FPS and card B an unplayable 20FPS, as both aggregate to 180 marks, yet the games-playing experience would be vastly different. You would, on balance, say that card A was better because it ran smoothly in both games. In our revised aggregation, card A would receive 150 marks (85 + 65) and card B 100 (100 + 0).
In effect, we're including a desired average framerate, in this case 60, and penalising lower performance whilst giving higher-than 60FPS framerates half as much credit as the framerate up to 60FPS. If that doesn't make sense or you have issue with it, please hit the HEXUS community.
Now, the HEXUS.bang4buck graph simply divides the normalised marks by the current price, to give you an easy-to-understand metric that takes value into account.
What it doesn't do is convey any non-benchmark advantages such as DX10 compliance for potentially better-looking visuals or the hardware-accelerated video-decoding engine present in the XFX GeForce 8600 GTS XXX. You can get away with charging a little more for a newer architecture that carries a better feature-set, but our bang4buck graph highlights that XFX is charging way too much for its XXX Edition. Indeed, looking at our high-resolution gaming is further evidence of this assertion.
Overclocking
We managed to raise the default 730/2260 frequencies to 783/2404MHz. That was enough to increase the Splinter Cell: Chaos Theory 1600x1200 HDR test score from 45.04FPS to 48.16FPS. Putting this into some kind of perspective, a stock-clocked ASUS GeForce 8800 GTS 320 returns around 84FPS.Temps
| Graphics cards | XFX GeForce 8600 GTS XXX | ECS N8600GTS 256MX+ | Inno3D XStriker3 256MB | XFX GeForce 8600 GT XXX | Inno3D iChiLL 7900GS Arctic Cooling Silencer 6 | ASUS Radeon EAX1950PRO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ambient temps | 25°C | 21.5°C | 20.5°C | 19°C | 19.5°C | 19.5°C |
| Idle temps | 49°C | 43°C | 42°C | 48°C | 42°C | 39°C |
| Load temps | 74°C | 66°C | 59°C | 77°C | 61°C | 59°C |
| Ambient-Load difference (lower is better) | 49°C | 44.5°C | 38.5°C | 58°C | 41.5°C | 39.5°C |
Much like its GT XXX brother, the GTS SKU becomes surprisingly warm when under load.
