facebook rss twitter

Review: ASUS EAX1800XL 256MB & HIS Excalibur X1800 XL 256MB PCIe graphics cards

by Tarinder Sandhu on 6 December 2005, 19:07

Tags: ATi Technologies (NYSE:AMD)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qad5y

Add to My Vault: x

System setup and notes

Hardware and Software

Test Platforms

Systems Athlon 64 S939 PCI-Express System
Processor AMD Athlon 64 4000+
Mainboard ABIT AX8 K8T890
Memory 1GByte (2x512MB) Corsair XMS3200 XL
Memory timings 2-2-2-5 1T @ DDR400
Graphics Card #1 ASUS RADEON EAX1800XL/2DHTV 256MB PCIe (500/1000)
Graphics Card #2 HIS Excalibur RADEON X1800 XL 256MB PCIe (500/1000)
Graphics Card #3 SAPPHIRE Radeon X1800 XT 512MB PCIe (625/1500)
Graphics Card #4 XFX GeForce 7800 GT OC 256MB PCIe (450/1050)
Graphics Card #5 GeForce 7800 GTX 256MB PCIe (430/1200)
Graphics Card #6 ATI Radeon X850 XT 256MB PCIe (520/1080)
Graphics Card #7 NVIDIA GeForce 6800 Ultra 256MB PCIe (425/1100)
Disk Drive 160GB Western Digital 160JB IDE
BIOS Version BIOS 13
Operating System Windows XP Professional SP2
Mainboard Software VIA Hyperion Pro v4.55


Software



ATI 8.173.2.3-050921a-027133C for both ATI Radeon X1800 XL 256MB cards
ATI 8.173.2.3-051014a1-027813C for SAPPHIRE X1800 XT 512MB
ATI CATALYST 5.10 for ATI X850 XT
NVIDIA ForceWare 81.85 for NVIDIA-based cards

Futuremark 3DMark05 Build 1.2.0 - AA and AF set via application
DOOM 3 (v1282) Timedemo 1 - AA and AF set via application
Far Cry v1.33 - custom HEXUS benchmark - AA and AF set via application
Splinter Cell: Chaos Theory v1.04 - custom HEXUS benchmark - AA and AF set via application

Notes


No problems to report during installation and testing of both Radeon X1800 XL cards. Considering the fact that both cards are, essentially, identical, we've only included one set of benchmark scores. Both cards produced results that were within the standard deviation of the tests themselves, so what applies for the ASUS card also applies for the HIS, and vice-versa. We've put them up against a range of high-end PCIe graphics cards. Perhaps the most interesting comparison will be against NVIDIA's GeForce 7800 GT, albeit an overclocked version from XFX. It's priced at similar levels and the prospective buyer needs to make a choice between '7800 GT and X1800 XL; it really is as simple as that.

The following table highlights the basic characteristics of each card.

Card ASUS/HIS Radeon X1800 XL SAPPHIRE Radeon X1800 XT ATI Radeon X850 XT XFX GeForce 7800 GT NVIDIA reference 7800 GTX GeForce 6800 Ultra
Manufacturing process 90nm 90nm 130nm 110nm 110nm 130nm
Interface/speed PCI-Express PCI-Express PCI-Express PCI-Express PCI-Express PCI-Express
Onboard memory 256MB 512MB 256MB 256MB 256MB 256MB
Core speed 500MHz 625MHz 520MHz 450MHz 430MHz 425MHz
Rendering pipelines 16 16 16 20 24 16
Fillrate (multi-texturing) 8GTexels/s 10GTexels/s 8.64GTexels/s 9GTexels/s 10.32GTexels/s 6.8GTexels/s
Vertex shading units 8 8 6 7 8 6
Shader Model 3.0 3.0 2.0b 3.0 3.0 3.0
Memory interface 256-bit 256-bit 256-bit 256-bit 256-bit 256-bit
Memory speed 1000MHz 1500MHz 1080MHz 1050MHz 1200MHz 1100MHz
Memory bandwidth (max) 32GB/s 48GB/s 34.56GB/s 33.6GB/s 38.4GB/s 35.2GB/s
Cheapest online price £299/£279 £380 £229 £265 £329 £299


Technology-wise, R520 and G70 are broadly similar, and both GPUs focus heavily on shading ability. ATI's R520 now supports Shader Model 3.0 and can also run high-dynamic range (HDR) lighting in conjunction with antialiaing. something which NVIDIA's G70 can't. Both competing GPUs carry decent 2D feature-sets, with ATI's Avivo getting the nod over NVIDIA's PureVideo.

Enough tech., on to the benchmarks