Test methodology
GPU comparisons |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Graphics card | Approx. pricing |
GPU clock (MHz) |
Stream processors |
Shader clock (MHz) |
Memory clock (MHz) |
Memory bus (bits) |
Graphics driver |
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 590 (3,072MB) | £575 | 607 | 1,024 | 1,214 | 3,414 | 384 x 2 | ForceWare 267.84 |
2x ASUS GeForce GTX 580 in SLI (3,072MB) | £780 | 772 | 512 | 1,544 | 4,008 | 384 x 2 | ForceWare 266.58 |
2x ASUS GeForce GTX 570 in SLI (2,560MB) | £560 | 732 | 960 | 1,464 | 3,600 | 320 x 2 | ForceWare 266.58 |
ASUS GeForce GTX 580 (1,536MB) | £390 | 772 | 1,024 | 1,544 | 4,008 | 384 | ForceWare 266.58 |
ASUS GeForce GTX 570 (1,280MB) | £280 | 732 | 480 | 1,464 | 3,800 | 320 | ForceWare 266.58 |
ASUS GeForce GTX 560 Ti DirectCU II TOP (1,024MB) | £210 | 900 | 384 | 1,800 | 4,200 | 256 | ForceWare 270.61 |
Point of View GeForce GTX 560 Ti (1,024MB) | £190 | 822 | 384 | 1,645 | 4,008 | 256 | ForceWare 270.61 |
Sapphire Radeon HD 6990 OC (4,096MB) | £500 | 880 | 3,072 | 880 | 5,000 | 256 x 2 | Catalyst 11.4 |
Sapphire Radeon HD 6990 (4,096MB) | £500 | 830 | 3,072 | 830 | 5,000 | 256 x 2 | Catalyst 11.4 |
2x HIS Radeon HD 6970 in CrossFire (4,096MB) | £540 | 880 | 3,072 | 880 | 5,500 | 256 x 2 | Catalyst 11.4 |
2x Sapphire Radeon HD 6950 in CrossFire (4,096MB) | £390 | 800 | 2,816 | 800 | 5,000 | 256 x 2 | Catalyst 11.4 |
HIS Radeon HD 6970 (2,048MB) | £270 | 880 | 1,536 | 880 | 5,500 | 256 | Catalyst 11.4 |
Sapphire Radeon HD 6950 (2,048MB) | £195 | 800 | 1,408 | 800 | 5,000 | 256 | Catalyst 11.4 |
Test bench |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPU | Intel Core i7 980X (3.33GHz, 12MB L3 cache, six-core, LGA1366) | |||||||||||
Motherboard | ASUS P6X58D-E (0502 BIOS) | |||||||||||
Memory | 6GB Corsair Dominator (9-9-9-24-2T @ 1,600MHz) | |||||||||||
Power Supply | Corsair HX1000W | |||||||||||
Monitor | Dell 30in 3007WFP | |||||||||||
Disk drive(s) | Crucial RealSSD C300 (256GB) | |||||||||||
Chassis | Corsair Obsidian Series 700D | |||||||||||
Operating system | Windows 7, SP1, 64-bit |
Benchmarks |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3DMark 11 | Extreme preset, overall score and combined test results recorded. | |||||||||||
Aliens vs. Predator | DX11, 1,920x1,080 and 2,560x1,600 resolutions, 4xAA, 16xAF, very high quality. | |||||||||||
Call of Duty: Black Ops | DX9, 1,920x1,080 and 2,560x1,600 resolutions, 8xAA, ultra quality, FRAPS-recorded benchmark. | |||||||||||
F1 2010 | DX11, 1,920x1,080 and 2,560x1,600 resolutions, 8xAA, ultra quality, Monaco circuit. | |||||||||||
Just Cause 2 | DX10, 1,920x1,080 and 2,560x1,600 resolutions, 4xAA, 16xAF, very high quality, Dark Tower benchmark. | |||||||||||
Metro 2033 | DX11, 1,920x1,080 and 2,560x1,600 resolutions, 4xAA, 16xAF, very high quality. | |||||||||||
StarCraft II | DX9, 1,920x1,080 and 2,560x1,600 resolutions, 4xAA, ultra quality. | |||||||||||
Power consumption | To emulate real-world usage scenarios, we record mains power draw both when idle and whilst playing Just Cause 2. | |||||||||||
Temperature | To emulate real-world usage scenarios, we record GPU core temperature both when idle and whilst playing Just Cause 2. | |||||||||||
Noise | A PCE-318 noise level meter is placed at front of a Corsair 700D chassis with side panel on. |
Notes
We ummed and arred before benchmarking the GTX 560 Ti, pondering whether the card should be benched in our high-end or mid-range test systems. Our conclusion? Any card costing close to or above the £200 mark should be able to deliver high-quality gaming at high resolutions.
That puts ASUS's GTX 560 Ti DirectCU II TOP up against some seriously powerful competition, and as a point of reference we've also benched a stock-clocked GTX 560 Ti card from Point of View.
We've got masses of anti-aliasing and some really demanding titles, will the 1GB GTX 560 Ti be able to cope or will it be out of its depth?