Power draw and HEXUS.bang4buck
Power draw
Power consumption - idle (system) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sapphire Radeon HD 4890 OC | BFG GeForce GTX 285 | BFG GeForce GTX 295 | BFG GeForce GTX 285 SLI | XFX GeForce GTX 275 | Sapphire Radeon HD 5870 | Sapphire Radeon HD 5870 XF | Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 X2 |
150 | 123 | 154 | 159 | 127 | 100 | 136 | 157 |
Power consumption - load (3D) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sapphire Radeon HD 4890 OC | BFG GeForce GTX 285 | BFG GeForce GTX 295 | BFG GeForce GTX 285 SLI | XFX GeForce GTX 275 | Sapphire Radeon HD 5870 | Sapphire Radeon HD 5870 XF | Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 X2 |
241 | 299 | 349 | 444 | 267 | 224 | 357 | 361 |
With the Radeon HD 5870 doing an excellent job of keeping power-draw in check, a pair of cards configured in CrossFireX are able to idle at an impressively-low 136W. The duo do draw 357W when under load, but it's worth noting that that figure remains lower than the erstwhile dual-GPU Radeon HD 4870 X2.
HEXUS.bang4buck
In a rough-and-ready assessment of the cards' bang per buck, we've aggregated the 2,560x1,600 frame-rates for five games, normalised them* and taken account of the cards' prices.
But there are more provisos than we'd care to shake a stick at. We could have chosen five different games, the cards' prices could have been derived from other sources and pricing tends to fluctuate daily.
Consequently, the table below highlights a metric that should only be used as a yardstick for evaluating comparative performance with price factored in. Other architectural benefits are not covered, obviously.
Graphics cards |
Sapphire
Radeon HD 5870 |
Sapphire
Radeon HD 5870 1,024MB |
Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 X2 2,048MB |
Sapphire Radeon HD 4890 OC 1,024MB |
BFG GeForce GTX 285 1,024MB (x2 in SLI) |
BFG
GeForce GTX 295 1,792MB |
BFG GeForce GTX 285 1,024MB |
XFX GeForce GTX 275 896MB |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual aggregate marks at 2,560x1,600 | 602.91 | 360.16 | 373.41 | 257.90 | 490.45 | 403.27 | 268.97 | 246.62 |
Aggregate marks, normalised*, at 2,560x1,600 | 451.46 | 330.08 | 336.70 | 258.18 | 395.23 | 351.64 | 241.58 | 226.91 |
Current pricing, including VAT | £598 (2x £299) | £299 | £242.97 | £177.10 | £500 (2x £250) | £346.00 | £250 | £159.26 |
HEXUS.bang4buck score at 2,560x1,600 | 0.755 | 1.104 | 1.386 | 1.459 | 0.790 | 1.016 | 0.966 | 1.425 |
Somewhat surprisingly, the near-£600 cost of two Radeon HD 5870s isn't a really bad proposition at 2,560x1,600, and that's down to the massive aggregate marks. There's simply a lot of performance for your pound, but let's not forget that cards such as the Radeon HD 4890 OC offer decent performance for a fraction of the price - hence the higher HEXUS.bang4buck score for older cards.
* the normalisation refers to taking playable frame rate into account. Should a card benchmark at over 60 frames per second in any one game, the extra fps count as half. Similarly, should a card benchmark lower, say at 40fps, we deduct half the difference from its average frame rate and the desired 60fps, giving it a HEXUS.bang4buck score of 30 marks. The minimum allowable frame rate is 20fps but that scores zero.
The HEXUS.bang4buck score only takes the performance and price into account, of course.