facebook rss twitter

Review: AMD Athlon II X4 620 and 630: introducing the budget quad-core CPUs

by Tarinder Sandhu on 16 September 2009, 05:00 4.1

Tags: Athlon II X4 620, AMD (NYSE:AMD)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qatyg

Add to My Vault: x

Rudimentary gaming

Appreciating that the CPU needs a core-logic, preferably with integrated graphics if budget is key, we've run some rudimentary benchmarks at 1,024x768 with low-detail settings.

CPU test - CoH - IGP DX9 - 1,024 0xAA
AMD Athlon II X4 620 (2.6GHz, 2MB L2)Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 (2.33GHz, 4MB L2)
38.6924.3


Company of Heroes (DX9) runs smoothly enough on the AMD 785G chipset, enabling decent gameplay, but is visually slower on the Intel GMA 4500

CPU test - CoH - IGP DX10 - 1,024 0xAA
AMD Athlon II X4 620 (2.6GHz, 2MB L2)Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 (2.33GHz, 4MB L2)
15.612.61


Neither chipset is able to do low-detail DX10 justice; Intel's performance is pitiful. The integrated graphics cannot run any form of AA in the game, either.

CPU test - ET:QW - 1,024x768 - IGP
AMD Athlon II X4 620 (2.6GHz, 2MB L2)Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 (2.33GHz, 4MB L2)
38.712.1


One is playable, one is not. Can you guess which?

CPU test - CoD 4 - 1,024x768 - IGP
AMD Athlon II X4 620 (2.6GHz, 2MB L2)Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 (2.33GHz, 4MB L2)
32.424.6


A clean sweep for the 785G. Performance isn't stellar by any means, absolutely, yet it's a far more compelling casual gamer's solution than the G43's GMA 4500.