facebook rss twitter

Review: Kingston KC2000 NVMe PCIe SSD (1TB)

by Parm Mann on 28 January 2020, 14:01

Tags: Kingston

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qaeh5n

Add to My Vault: x

Introduction

Kingston has been making waves in the SSD market with a new range of budget-friendly solutions designed to entice those users still clinging to their ageing hard disks. The KC600 proved a fine choice for PCs limited to SATA, while systems with an available M.2 slot are prime candidates for the well-rounded A2000.

Both offer competent performance at their respective price points, but neither can be deemed an ideal fit for enthusiasts who like to push their rigs a little bit further. That's where the Kingston KC2000 comes in. Delivered in an M.2 form factor, said drive promises "superior NVMe speeds" and "outstanding endurance" for desktop, workstation and high-performance PCs.

Sequential speeds of up to 3,200MB/s are the obvious attraction - that's almost a 50 per cent increase on the 2,200MB/s advertised by the aforementioned A2000 - and if you're hoping to lay claim to as much high-speed storage as possible, the KC2000 is available in a 2TB capacity, doubling what's on offer from Kingston's mainstream alternative.

It will be interesting to see the two product lines side-by-side, and recent adjustments to pricing may help bring the KC2000 back into focus. Readers should note that the high-performance range was originally launched some six months ago, but having come away impressed with the A2000, we're intrigued to see if there's merit to Kingston's pricier proposition.

Kingston NVMe PCIe SSDs

Model Series
Capacity
250GB
500GB
1TB
250GB
500GB
1TB
2TB
Controller
Silicon Motion SM2263EN
Silicon Motion SM2262EN
NAND
Micron 96-layer 3D TLC
Micron 96-layer 3D TLC
Encryption
XTS-AES 256-bit
XTS-AES 256-bit
Interface
NVMe PCIe Gen 3.0 x4
NVMe PCIe Gen 3.0 x4
Dimensions
80mm x 22mm x 3.5mm
80mm x 22mm x 3.5mm
Sequential Read Speed
2,000MB/s
2,200MB/s
2,200MB/s
3,000MB/s
3,000MB/s
3,200MB/s
3,200MB/s
Sequential Write Speed
1,100MB/s
2,000MB/s
2,000MB/s
1,100MB/s
2,000MB/s
2,200MB/s
2,200MB/s
Random IOPs (4KB Reads)
150K IOPs
180K IOPs
250K IOPs
350K IOPs
350K IOPs
350K IOPs
250K IOPs
Random IOPs (4KB Writes)
180K IOPs
200K IOPs
220K IOPs
200K IOPs
250K IOPs
275K IOPs
250K IOPs
Endurance
150 TBW
350 TBW
600 TBW
150 TBW
300 TBW
600 TBW
1,200 TBW
Power Consumption (Max Write)
4.5W
7.0W
Power Consumption (Average)
0.08W
0.2W
Power Consumption (Idle)
0.003W
0.003W
Life Expectancy
2m Hours
2m Hours
Warranty
5 Years
5 Years
Current Retail Price
£40
£75
£130
£55
£85
£145
£350

At the time of writing, a 1TB Kingston KC2000 fetches around £145 at retail, representing a 12 per cent premium over its 1TB A2000 sibling. The extra outlay opens the door to a tried-and-trusted Silicon Motion SM2262EN controller, and a bump in sequential read and write speeds from 2,200/2,000MB/s to 3,200/2,300MB/s, respectively.

Peak random read performance sees a dramatic boost, climbing by 40 per cent from 250K to 350K IOPS, however both maximum and average power consumption are also increased, making the KC2000 less preferable for laptop or battery-powered systems. Elsewhere, the two product lines share plenty of similarities, including 96-layer 3D TLC NAND, endurance ratings that are decent but not spectacular, a standard five-year warranty, and security options spanning 256-bit XTS-AES hardware encryption and compatibility with a variety of TCG Opal software management solutions.

The software bundle also remains unchanged. A license key for Acronis True Image OEM is included to help ease the transition to a new drive, while the pictured Kingston SSD Manager handles firmware updates while keeping tabs on drive health and security.

One other point of differentiation is appearance. KC2000's black PCB is a tad more stylish than the blue A2000, however the double-sided layout is somewhat cramped. Beneath the warranty sticker on the front of the drive resides the controller and four 128GB NAND packages, a further four are located on the rear, alongside a pair of 512MB DRAM chips. Performance will ultimately determine whether or not the KC2000 still makes sense next to the affordable A2000, so let's roll the benchmarks.