facebook rss twitter

EU demands significant changes to Google desktop and mobile

by Alistair Lowe on 23 July 2012, 09:43

Tags: Google (NASDAQ:GOOG)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qabjxz

Add to My Vault: x

Google has had a long history with the EU commission when it comes to anti-trust, anti-competition and a few more antis. The firm has been scrutinised over rights to out-of-copyright books, market monopolisation, privacy concerns and data protection.

Often in many of these conflicts and investigations, Google has come out on-top, with many of its business decisions holding the greater good of the public in mind. However, as the firm's dominance has grown, so too perhaps has its ego, at least, that's what the EU commission appears to believe.

The two groups are currently in talks over anti-competitive practises, where Google is accused of prioritising its own products and services over those of third-party providers. Google's general argument is that users can leave the firm at the click of a button and never return and so, value added functionality is a necessity.

Reports are indicating that whilst Google has been working with the EU commission to agree upon certain changes and practises to avoid a potential multi-billion pound fine, talks may be on the "knife edge" as the EU has begun demanding at the last minute significant changes to Google's mobile services.

It's suggested that the EU is preparing to serve within, perhaps, the next few weeks, a "statement of objections" should it not be able to come to terms with the firm, that will officially kick off proceedings. So which will it be? An overhaul of Google services and practises, or a big fine? Either way something fairly significant is likely to take place over the next few months.



HEXUS Forums :: 9 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
So I assume,they are going to look into other large companies like Apple too??
Apple, Microsoft, Google, Motorola, to name but a few of the big name technology corporations the EU has or is taking an, anti-competitive practice, interest in.

Unfortunately it seems a specific complaint, followed by length and costly proceedings is needed to persuade such companies to do, what many in Europe would believe, is the right thing.
The two groups are currently in talks over anti-competitive practises, where Google is accused of prioritising its own products and services over those of third-party providers.
Sorry, is there anyone out there with an ounce of common sense who wouldn't assume that someone like Google would give preference to their services over other people's? Are the EU commission (remembering that these are the same morons who are insisting on ACTA) assuming that Google should give equal billing (or worse - preference) to say - SkyDrive or Dropbox? What exactly are they complaining about?
I just Bing'd “office suite” and the first entry (in the ad's section) was for Office 2010. Although when I Bing'd “operating system” the ad given was for OS X - which raised a smile. Similarly a Google search for “free online storage” (e.g. Google Drive) doesn't actually mention Drive - in which case I'm kind of confused what the objection is.

And before I get labelled as a “Google Apologist” - I'm not. I get uneasy about the amount of information that they're holding - but then again figure that this is the price of the (free?) services that I'm using from Google.
CAT-THE-FIFTH
So I assume,they are going to look into other large companies like Apple too??

Yeah they've already kicked up a stick over IMO pretty daft things like browser choice and now this; Apple goes above and beyond any of it in terms of anti-competitiveness!
watercooled
Yeah they've already kicked up a stick over IMO pretty daft things like browser choice and now this; Apple goes above and beyond any of it in terms of anti-competitiveness!

But does it?
The EU have stiffed Microsoft with hefty fines for having it's own browser installed, yet they haven't complained to Apple about coming pre-installed with Safari?
Seems a bit mental to me. I'm all for anti-competitive, but when your product comes bundled with stuff, you're not obliged to use it. Seems we're incapable of making the decision on our own, and need hand-holding by the EUC.