facebook rss twitter

As SOPA closes in, hackers look to space for the answer

by Alistair Lowe on 2 January 2012, 12:21

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qabalr

Add to My Vault: x

Each year, a gathering of hackers takes place in Germany, known as the Chaos Communication Congress. The four-day event, now located in Berlin, has been running since 1984 and in 2004 saw a record attendance of 4,230 participants. The congress provides lectures, workshops and discussions on technology, society and utopia.

The 28th Chaos Communication Congress (28C3), which ran with the motto "Behind enemy lines", took place just prior to the New Year, during which time, a scheme to launch satellites into orbit and develop ground stations for tracking was outlined, with the intention of forming a Hackerspace Global Grid, free of censorship and as a backup for hackers during natural or economic disaster. Activists claim that the increasing threat of censorship, such as the recent SOPA Act, had motivated the project, with activist Nick Farr calling out for support for the project in August "The first goal is an uncensorable internet in space. Let's take the internet out of the control of terrestrial entities."

The project is currently in the stage of developing its knowledge-base and understanding, certain limitations must be worked with; typically amateur projects involve sending satellites into low-Earth orbit with balloons, however in non-standard orbits and orbits not situated around the equator, satellites travel quickly around the earth in a non-fixed manner, making them difficult to track. Step one of the project will involve the development of affordable and portable base stations for use in tracking satellite positions.

Satellite Balloon Launch

Mr Farr claims that the project's "only motive" behind the Hackerspace Global Grid is knowledge, "Hackers are about open information ... we believe communication is a human right."

Others question the potential use of such a network as a way to bypass measures implemented to block distribution of intellectual property and copyrighted materials. Whilst the practical usage of such a network remains to be seen, it has raised the question of space rights, though a satellite in orbit would fall under no country's jurisdiction, like-wise no international law exists to protect said satellite from aggressive measures from any country or entity.

An interesting project indeed and a most amazing feat should the community succeed in reaching its goals. We only hope that such satellites are able to remain in orbit without becoming victim to laser fire from a large firm or country.



HEXUS Forums :: 15 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
If they succeed it will be a monumental step in the right direction.

While I expect the project to be blocked in some manner I trust the motives for the blocking and the culprits will be revealed which will be a small step towards their goal.
a monumental step in the right direction

I am sure they said the same thing in the Russian revolution. Its all well and good having lofty ideals but having us to carry them out is the greatest flaw. These things have to be monitored and would fight to get it monitored.
Pilgrim_uk
I am sure they said the same thing in the Russian revolution. Its all well and good having lofty ideals but having us to carry them out is the greatest flaw. These things have to be monitored and would fight to get it monitored.

What was wrong with the Russian revolution?

And why do these things ‘have to be monitored’?
What was wrong with the Russian revolution?

Far too big a question that I could answer.

And why do these things ‘have to be monitored’?

Near orbit communication should be regulated. With the amount of space garbage out there already do we really need a bunch of amateurs throwing more garbage into our atmosphere.
@ Pilgrim_uk

Amateurs can often be exceptional in their field of choice; the only difference between amateur and professional is that amateurs don't do it for money, something that is often forgotten.

I would agree with you that near earth satellites should be limited in number. It will become far too difficult to co-ordinate them should they over populate our skies, but that doesn't mean they need to be “monitored” or “regulated”.