facebook rss twitter

Music tax follow-up: UK music industry echoes US/EU initiatives

by Scott Bicheno on 20 April 2008, 17:44

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qamr7

Add to My Vault: x

Dinosaurs demand extension of Jurassic period

Anticipating policy-making trends in Britain is straightforward: whenever a really, really bad idea surfaces in the States, be assured that it will fly across the pond at warp speed.

Thus, as we predicted, the music tax mooted by Warner Music Group last month soon found dismal echo in the UK.

The Music Business Group (MBG), expressing ‘the collective view of the UK music industry’, wants to tax music players such as the iPod. ‘Unquestionably, there is a value produced by the ability to format shift,’ said the MBG on 8 April. ‘It is imperative that creators and performers should benefit directly from this value.’

Not to mention copyright holders, record labels, and shareholders.

The MBG cited a statement by EU Internal Market Commissioner, the ex-Fianna Fail Minister of Finance Charlie McCreevy, last February. ‘There can be no question of calling into doubt the entitlement of rights holders to compensation for private copying,’ said McCreevy.

A French EU initiative to force ISPs to disconnect illegal file sharers was narrowly defeated on 10 April.

‘The Government’s Creative Britain report rightly recognises the heroic contribution made by the creative industries to the prosperity of the UK, said MBG Chairman Stephen Navin, who is also the CEO of the Music Publishers Association. ‘Here is a clear opportunity to fortify our creativity. The UK music industry is united on this issue in calling for parity with our European counterparts.’

Well, we wouldn’t want to get out of step with them, would we?



HEXUS Forums :: 6 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
#rant

arghh seriously what the hell is wrong with these people, surely they must be inbred to even come up with such idiotic ideas. If i've got the gist of what they're wanting right, why should they be after more of my money when i've already bought and paid for an album. It's not like starbucks sell you you a coffee and then say “Oh i see you're enjoying that coffee in a way we didn't anticipate we want more money because the multimillion $ profit we're already making just isn't quite enough enough, we want your soul too”

makes me mad :angst:

#endrant
“Dinosaurs demand extension of Jurassic period” Brilliant :laugh:

It seems the music industry seems be one of the few people who don't subscribe to the innocent until proven guilty concept.
If I buy music on CD and transfer it to me MP3 player, where have they lost a sale exactly? Presumably they want me to pay for another digital, even maybe DRM'ed version?

There is still very few reasonably priced, non DRM digital download outlets available. Amazing for 2008 really.
Like I heard somewhere else, they'll be wanting to add a tax on my electricity supply next so I can listen to the stuff I've bought on my MP3 player. The whole idea stinks of greed. If they end up taxing me as though I'm a pirate then I see no reason to continue to make legal purchases.
Agent
….

If I buy music on CD and transfer it to me MP3 player, where have they lost a sale exactly? Presumably they want me to pay for another digital, even maybe DRM'ed version? …
It seems that's exactly what they want, because currently, in the UK, you are breaching their copyright if you do transfer to your MP3 player, or a tape, or your computer.

Instead of trying to tax people for that kind of reasonable personal use, I've got a better idea …. change a stupid and outdated law.
Saracen
It seems that's exactly what they want, because currently, in the UK, you are breaching their copyright if you do transfer to your MP3 player, or a tape, or your computer.

Instead of trying to tax people for that kind of reasonable personal use, I've got a better idea …. change a stupid and outdated law.

Is it what they want though, or as result of a law being badly applied to modern day technology compared to when it was written?
They did say back in 06 that they had no plans to go after people for personal use.
BBC NEWS | Entertainment | UK music fans can copy own tracks
Not that the BPI are a legal entity though.

There were recommendations to change it, but I don't think there has been anything else done about it (although it was only at the start of this year to be fair).

Government backs private copying in copyright reform plan | OUT-LAW.COM
Consultation on proposed changes to Copyright Exceptions