facebook rss twitter

Scan 3XS i3 OC SMART Edition GTX 460 system review. Featuring GeForce GTX 460

by Tarinder Sandhu on 20 July 2010, 22:49 4.5

Tags: 3XS i3 SMART Edition GTX 460, SCAN

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qay7v

Add to My Vault: x

Up against a two-year-old mid-range PC


Comparison systems
System 3XS i3 OC SMART Edition GTX 460 HEXUS two-year-old mid-range 
Processor Intel Core i3 530 overclocked to 4.0GHz Intel Core 2 Duo E6700 @ 2.67GHz
Motherboard ASUS P7H55-M Intel D975XBX2
Memory Corsair 4GB (2 x 2GB) DDR3 Corsair 4GB (2 x 2GB) DDR2
Memory timings 9-9-9-24-1T @ 1,600MHz 5-5-5-18-2T @ 800MHz
Graphics Gainward GeForce GTX 460 768MB @ 800/3,900MHz Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 512MB
Graphics driver ForceWare 258.80 Catalyst 10.6
Disk drive 1TB Samsung Spinpoint F3 (7,200rpm) 500GB Seagate 7200.12 (7,200rpm)
Optical drive Samsung 22x DVD-RW Sony 16x DVD-RW
Chassis SilverStoneTek Precision PS04B Cooler Master ATCS 110B
Power supply Corsair HX450W Enermax 500W
Operating system Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit
Cost (including VAT) £716 NA
Benchmarks
HEXUS.PiFast
Our number-crunching benchmark stresses a single core by calculating Pi to 10m places.
Geekbench 2.1.6 A cross-platform benchmark used to measure memory and processor performance. Run using high-performance mode.
Cinebench 11.5 Using Cinebench's multi-CPU render, this cross-platform benchmark stresses as many cores as possible. Run using high-performance mode.
x264 3.0 HD encoding Our media-encoding benchmark converts a 720p movie into the H.264 format. Pass two calculated.
3DMark06 A PC benchmark used to test the DirectX 9 performance of a system's graphics card. Run using high-performance mode.
DiRT 2 v1.1 1,920x1,080, 4xAA, ultra quality, London map. DX9
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 1,920x1,080, 4xAA, ultra quality, FRAPS-recorded benchmark.
Power consumption Using balanced power settings, we record mains power draw when idle and whilst playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 with Prime 95


Notes

There's little point in showing you the comparative performance against a £2,000 monster PC. Rather, to make it worthwhile and interesting, we put the Scan system alongside a mid-range system that would have passed muster two years ago. What we want to know is how much more performance, if any, a mid-2010 build gives over something that was cutting edge in 2008.

It's dual-core, quad-threaded CPU vs. dual-core, dual-threaded CPU, albeit a highly-clocked model from Scan, and it's DX11 graphics goodness up against DX10.