facebook rss twitter

Review: ASUS Eee Top ET1602: a glimpse of computers to come?

by Parm Mann on 12 February 2009, 09:25 3.25

Tags: Eee Top ET1602, ASUSTeK (TPE:2357)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qaqvw

Add to My Vault: x

A quick look at performance

Knowing that the ASUS Eee Top ET1602 features essentially the same innards as the majority of existing netbooks, we know not to expect much in terms of performance. Nonetheless, it wouldn't be a HEXUS.net review without a little number crunching, so here goes.

As the first nettop to reach our labs, ASUS' Eee Top finds itself in a unique and awkward spot - we don't have any other nettops to compare it too. Given its limited hardware capability, it also isn't ideally suited to comparison with the high-end desktops we're accustomed to testing.

Consequently, to paint a picture of general performance, we'll be comparing Eee Top numbers to a similar-specification Wind U100 netbook, and a pair of mid-range notebooks featuring Intel Mobile Core 2 Duo and AMD Turion Ultra processors.

Here's a more complete breakdown of the four systems in question:


System name ASUS Eee Top ET1602 MSI Wind U100 Novatech Centrino 2 X20mv Pro HP Pavilion TX2520
Processor Intel Atom N270 (1.6GHz, 512KB L2 cache, single-core) Intel Atom N270 (1.6GHz, 512KB L2 cache, single-core) Intel Mobile Core 2 Duo P8400 (2.26GHz, 3MB L2 cache, 1,066MHz, dual-core) AMD Turion Ultra ZM-80 (2.1GHz, 2x 1,024KB L2 cache, dual-core)
Motherboard ASUS U-100 (i945GE+ICH7M) MSI U-100 (i945GE+ICH7M) Clevo M720T Quanta HP 780G (780G+SB700)
Memory 1GB PC5400 1GB PC5400 2GB (2x 1GB) PC6400 3GB (2GB + 1GB) PC6400
Graphics card(s) Intel i945GSE Intel i945GSE Intel Mobile X4500 ATI Radeon HD 3200 IGP (500MHz core, 800MHz mem)
Screen size and native res 15.6in - 1,366x768 (touchscreen) 10in - 1,024x600 12.1in - 1,280x800 12.1in - 1,280x800
WiFi 802.11b/g/n 802.11b/g Realtek RTL8187B 802.11b/g Broadcom 4322AG 802.11a/b/g/n
Disk drive(s) 160GB, 5,400RPM, 8MB cache Western Digital 80GB, 5,400RPM, 8MB cache Hitachi 200GB, 5,400RPM, 8MB cache Western Digital 250GB, 5,400RPM, 8MB cache
Optical drive(s) None None TSST SN-S083A HLDTST GSA-T30L
Operating System Windows XP Home SP3, 32-bit Windows XP Home SP3, 32-bit Windows Vista Home Premium SP1, 32-bit Windows Vista Home Premium SP1, 32-bit 

Benchmarks HEXUS.photofix - 152MB photos auto-fixed - 25 images
HEXUS.squeeze - 205MB photos compressed into one file
HEXUS.gaming - Quake 4 v1.3 custom-recorded netdemo at 1,024x600/768
HEXUS.power - under-load power reading, taken whilst running Quake 4

Notes

As you can see, this is anything but an apples-to-apples comparison. What we're hoping to show is what users can expect in terms of performance when carrying out everyday computing tasks.

So, what can and can't be done on an Atom N270-powered nettop?