facebook rss twitter

Armari BrontaStor 4TE NAS review

by Parm Mann on 7 June 2010, 08:59 3.0

Tags: BrontaStor 4TE, Armari

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qayiw

Add to My Vault: x

Test methodology

Network-attached storage

  Armari BrontaStor 4TE Thecus N4200 QNAP TS-439 Pro
Price (without HDDs) £497.99 £520 £600
CPU 1.60GHz Intel Atom 330
(dual-core, 1MB L2 cache)
1.66GHz Intel Atom D510
(dual-core, 1MB L2 cache)
1.60GHz Intel Atom N270
(single-core, 512KB L2 cache)
Memory 2GB DDR2 1GB DDR2 1GB DDR2
Disk drive(s) 4x 2TB Hitachi 7K2000 4x 1TB Samsung HD103SJ 4x 1TB Samsung HD103SJ
RAID mode RAID 5 RAID 5 RAID 5
Network connectivity Dual Gigabit Ethernet Dual Gigabit Ethernet Dual Gigabit Ethernet
Firmware S3115 R1.01 3.02.01 3.2.6 Build 0423

Client

CPU 3.2GHz Intel Core i7 965 Extreme Edition
GPU Sapphire Radeon HD 5850 1,024MB
Graphics driver Catalyst 10.3a
Motherboard ASUS P6X58D Premium
Motherboard BIOS 0703
Mainboard software Intel Inf 9.1.1.1025
Memory 2GB Corsair DDR3-1,067 CL7
Memory timings and speed 7-7-7-20 1T @ DDR3-1,066
Network connectivity Marvell Yukon 88E8056 GbE
PSU Corsair HX1000W
Monitor Dell 30in 3007WFP - 2,560x1,600px
Disk drive(s) Corsair Nova V128 SSD
Operating system Windows 7 Ultimate, 64-bit

Software

Benchmarks Iometer v2008.06.18-RC2
Intel NAS Performance Toolkit v1.7.1
File copy test (8.83GB)
Power draw

Notes

For comparison's sake, we've included benchmark results for two alternative NAS solutions; the Thecus N4200 and QNAP TS-439 Pro.

The Armari BrontaStor 4TE is tested as shipped with four 2TB Hitachi drives in a RAID 5 configuration. The Thecus and QNAP boxes are configured with four Samsung 1TB drives, also in a RAID 5 configuration.

All three units were tested using a single Gigabit Ethernet link with Jumbo frames disabled, connected to our client and network via a Netgear GS108 switch.

Iometer, a familiar benchmark in our test suite, is an I/O subsystem measurement tool. For the purpose of our NAS testing, we set a queue depth of 16 (outstanding I/Os) and run the following four benchmarks:

  • 64KB transfer, 100% sequential, 100% read
  • 64KB transfer, 100% sequential, 100% write
  • 64KB transfer, 100% random, 67% read and 33% write
  • 1MB transfer, 100% sequential, 100% read

Our second benchmark - the NAS Performance Toolkit, developed by Intel - is a file-system exerciser specifically designed to provide performance comparisons between NAS devices. Intel's utility focuses on user-level performance using real-world workload traces gathered from typical digital home applications such as HD video playback and record. Intel NASPT reproduces the file-system traffic observed in these traces onto a chosen storage solution and records performance in MB/s.

Taking a look at a simple usage scenario, our file copy test involves copying a mixed assortment of files totaling 8.83GB in size from our client to the NAS. The result is recorded in time taken to complete.

Last but not least, we measure NAS power draw during three states; under load, idle and standby mode if applicable.