facebook rss twitter

Review: BIOSTAR K8NHA Grand nForce3 250Gb

by Tarinder Sandhu on 29 October 2004, 00:00

Tags: Biostar

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qa3q

Add to My Vault: x

System setup and notes

Here's a quick rundown of the test system should you wish to compare benchmark results with your own.
  • BIOSTAR K8NHA Grand, S754, NVIDIA nForce3 250Gb chipset
  • EPoX 8HDA3+, S754, VIA K8T800 chipset

Other components

  • AMD Athlon 64 Model 3200+ CPU (2.0GHz, 1MB L2 cache)
  • NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GT 256MB, AGP, 350/1000
  • 1x512MB Crucial Ballistix PC4000 RAM, run at 2-2-2-6 @ DDR400 on both boards
  • Pioneer 105 DVD-RW
  • Western Digital 160GB (WD1600) 8MB cache hard drive
  • Dell P991 19" monitor

Software

  • Windows XP Professional SP1
  • DirectX 9.0b runtime
  • NVIDIA ForceWare 5.10 driver set
  • VIA Hyperion 4.53 driver set
  • NVIDIA ForceWare 61.77 graphics driver
  • Pifast v4.1 to 10m places
  • Lame v3.92 MP3 encoding with Razor-Lame 1.15 front-end using U2's Pop album (611MB)
  • HEXUS XviD encoding test
  • KribiBench 1.1
  • ScienceMark 2.0
  • Realstorm Raytracing benchmark - 2004 512x384
  • 3DMark 2001SE v330
  • UT2003 Retail (Build 2225)
  • Comanche 4 benchmark
  • DOOM 3 - Timedemo 1
Notes

I've chosen to compare BIOSTAR's nForce3 250Gb motherboard against an EPoX board sporting VIA's rival K8T800 chipset. Note that this isn't the newer Pro iteration, but benchmark results between the regular and Pro chipsets are within the standard deviation of each test. No problems to report during installation or testing, even when both boards were run with tight memory timings.

Overclocking

The inherent problem with overclocking on the K8NHA Grand is the lack of multiplier selection. One is limited to simply raising the driven clock until stability failure, usually caused by the CPU's air-cooled ceiling and not the chipset's. In view of this and the use of an AMD Athlon 64 3200+ Clawhammer CPU, I was able to run at a maximum driven clock of 225MHz before stability was compromised. BIOSTAR appears to be rather slow in releasing BIOSes for its range of motherboards, too.