facebook rss twitter

Review: EPoX 8RDA3G nForce2 Ultra 400

by Tarinder Sandhu on 18 September 2003, 00:00

Tags: AMD (NYSE:AMD), NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA), EPoX

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qatk

Add to My Vault: x

System setup and notes

Here's a quick rundown of the test system should you wish to compare benchmark results with your own.
  • AMD Barton XP3200+ S462 CPU (2200MHz / 200FSB)
  • Intel Pentium 4 3.2GHz 800FSB CPU (3.2GHz / 200FSB)
  •  
  • EPoX 8RDA3G nForce2 Ultra 400 (21/7/03 BIOS)
  • EPoX 4PDA2+ i865PE Springdale
  • MSI KT6 Delta-FIS2R KT600

Other components

  • ATi Radeon 9800 Pro (380/340)
  • 2 x 256MB Corsair XMS3500C2, run at 2-6-2-2 @ DDR-400 for all three motherboards
  • Liteon 16x DVD
  • Samcheer 420w PSU
  • Samsung 181T TFT monitor
  • Akasa Silver Mountain cooler
  • Intel reference cooler

Software

  • Windows XP Professional Build 2600.xpclient.010817-1148
  • DirectX9.0a
  • Intel 5.00.1012 chipset drivers
  • Hyperion 4.48 VIA service pack
  • NVIDIA nForce 2.45 drivers
  • ATI CATALYST 3.2 drivers and control panel (6307s)
  • Pifast v41 to 10m places
  • Lame v3.92 MP3 encoding with Razor-Lame 1.15 front-end using U2's Pop album
  • SiSoft SANDRA 2003 (9.73 release)
  • Hexus SETI benchmark
  • 3DMark 2001SE
  • UT2003 Demo (Build 2206)
  • Comanche 4 benchmark
  • Serious Sam 2 Demo
  • Quake 3 v1.30 HQ

Notes

Normally this section just deals with the methods by which benchmarks will be conducted. Sample motherboards usually work just fine. However, with this sample, a few idiosyncrasies presented themselves. Firstly, several Barton and Athlon XP Thoroughbred chips were tested. None of these managed to boot the board at 200FSB; the running speed of the nForce2 Ultra 400 chipset. The highest stable frequency was 198MHz FSB. Raising the chipset voltage did nothing to solve the problem. After much hair-tearing, it emerged that the board had been shipped with the JCLK (clock select) jumper in the wrong position. Moving it over a notch rectified the problem. This may just be an isolated incident but we feel that it's worthy of attention here.

Another aspect centred around relatively poor voltage regulation, if the BIOS was to be believed. Setting a Vcore of 1.65v resulted in a Windows load voltage of between 1.55 - 1.58v. EPoX's previous boards have been pretty good on the voltage lines in the past. Even DDR voltage wasn't immune to under-volting. Setting 2.90v DDR in BIOS gave around 2.77v under load. It's difficult to say whether this is a board specific or widespread issue. We're just thankful that EPoX gives the user enough voltage to play around with in the first place.

Lastly, and perhaps most curious of all was, on occasion, the board's ability to manually change the FSB in Windows. Setting it at, say, 2200MHz, it would sometimes update the speed on the fly from anywhere between 1600MHz to 2200MHz, according to the latest build of CPU-Z. This was only discovered after inconsistent benchmark runs. Yet if the board was rebooted, it maintained a rock-solid frequency. The benchmarks that follow are based on a stable frequency.

After most of the small niggles were ironed out, the sample 8RDA3G was extremely stable at 200MHz FSB+. FSB testing, with a Vdd set to 1.8v (1.76v under load), seemed to suggest that it was stable right up to 226FSB. That's par for the course these days, we feel. The board ran a standard XP3200+ CPU at 2205.1MHz; 5.1MHz above official specification.