Multi-threaded performance
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0a68/b0a6811ae85affe05e68c3f26f8d84790543c2a3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82864/82864144b8101b8532fb44ffe47fc69e846956a6" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9de80/9de805182d4c6cb2bbb39af851bce32d3843f309" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86aa4/86aa48709dd2cef895b3ea2fa8e2c2d71b775e72" alt=""
All but one of our multi-threaded applications favour Intel's Core Microarchitecture over AMD's aging K8. The only exception is CINEBENCH R9.5, where the BE-2350 comes in just over 2% faster.
by James Thorburn
on 25 October 2007, 13:11
Tags:
RS690IKM-AB6S,
AMD (NYSE:AMD),
VIA Technologies (TPE:2388),
EQS
Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qaj6f
Add to My Vault:
|
|
All but one of our multi-threaded applications favour Intel's Core Microarchitecture over AMD's aging K8. The only exception is CINEBENCH R9.5, where the BE-2350 comes in just over 2% faster.
Sign in for the best HEXUS experience
LOG IN