facebook rss twitter

Review: ASUS vs ASUS: GeForce 8800 Ultra vs. Radeon HD 2900 XT.

by Tarinder Sandhu on 18 July 2007, 08:34

Tags: ASUS GeForce 8800, Asus Radeon HD 2900 XT, ASUSTeK (TPE:2357)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qajc5

Add to My Vault: x

ASUS EN8800ULTRA appearance and thoughts





ASUS keeps the reference-clocked theme going by running default frequencies (612/1500/2160) on its NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra.



The big cooler keeps the underlying G80 core cool without making a racket. The under-load fan-speed doesn't change noticeably from the low hum exhibited in 2D. Good, efficient design; just make sure your chassis has room for it.



NVIDIA asserted that it's reworked part of the core for better thermal management. As such, it claims, the higher-clocked Ultra runs off a slightly lower TDP - 175W vs. 177W - when compared to the GeForce 8800 GTX.

The heatsink obscures 768MiBs of GDDR3 memory that runs at a faster speed than the Radeon HD 2900 XT's but interfaces with a narrower memory bus - 384-bit vs. 512-bit. The upshot is that both cards produce over 100GB/s of juicy bandwidth; great for antialising and super-high resolution gaming.



The all-black appearance and full-length cooling appendage gives the Ultra a mean, mean look. It costs Ā£420, so your bank manager might also give you the same look.



Warm air is exhausted from the vent you see at the top of the backplate. Both DVI ports are dual-link but, unlike the Radeon HD 2900 XT, can only carry HDCP-protected signals over a single-link connection. Still, though, there's more than enough bandwidth for 1080p transfers.

Brief summary

The ASUS EN8800ULTRA/G/HTDP/768M/A is a regular-clocked GeForce 8800 Ultra in every way, shape and form.