facebook rss twitter

Review: AMD Radeon HD 2600 XT and Radeon HD 2400 XT - saviours or sinners

by Tarinder Sandhu on 1 July 2007, 18:22

Tags: AMD (NYSE:AMD)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qai7d

Add to My Vault: x

Radeon HD 2400 XT system setup and notes


Hardware

Graphics cards AMD Radeon HD 2400 XT GDDR3 256MiB Palit GeForce 8500 GT 256MiB
Price (expected) £46 £52
Shader Model 4.0
GPU Clock Speed (MHz) 695 450
Shader Clock Speed (MHz) 695 900
Memory Clock Speed (MHz) 1584 800
Memory Bus Width (Bits) 64 128
Memory bandwidth (GB/s) 12.672 12.80
CPU AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+ AM2 (2.20GHz, 1MiB L2 cache, dual-core)
Motherboard Sapphire PI-AM2RS690MHD - ATI RS690+SB600 ASUS M2NPV-VM - NVIDIA NF430+GF6150
Motherboard BIOS 2K070211A 0504
Memory 1GByte (2 x 512MByte) OCZ26671024ELDCGE-K PC5400
Memory timings and speed 4-4-4-8 @ DDR2-667
Disk drive(s) 160GB Seagate Barracuda 7200.9 (3Gb/s mode)
Mainboard software CATALYST 7.1 southbridge package NVIDIA platform driver 8.26
Graphics driver 8.38.9.1-070613a-048915E-ATI (Cat 7.7 BETA) ForceWare 158.22
Operating System Windows XP Professional, w/ SP2, 32-bit


Software

3D Benchmarks Far Cry v1.33
Quake 4 v1.30 - Medium quality
Splinter Cell: Chaos Theory v1.05


Notes

Here are the same games run at lower resolution settings, to match the cards' credentials. We've compared the Radeon HD 2400 XT 256MiB to a Palit GeForce 8500 GT 256MiB, and both should be priced at around the £50 mark.

The platform has been changed to reflect a low-end setup likely to be used with such cards.

It's another game of swings and roundabouts as far as comparing the architectures is concerned. The GeForce 8500 GT has roughly the same shading power and memory bandwidth, run with slower memory through a double-wide (128-bit) interface. Having 8 ROPs should give it the edge in pure fillrate and antialiasing.

Benchmarks were conducted at 1024x768 and 1280x1024, without antialiasing or anisotropic filtering applied. As always, we ran each benchmark a trio of times and then calculated the arithmetic mean. If any of the three results looked erroneous, we threw all three away until we could collect three within a margin of statistical error. We report any major attempts needed to get three reliable results, of course. Apart from that, things are as noted on the graphs and in the graph commentary.