facebook rss twitter

Review: Sapphire Radeon X1950 Pro 256MiB

by Tarinder Sandhu on 17 October 2006, 11:04

Tags: Sapphire RADEON X1950 PRO, Sapphire

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qag3i

Add to My Vault: x

System setup and notes

Hardware

System ATI Radeon X1950 Pro/1900 GT NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GS
Processor Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 (2.40GHz, 4MiB L2 cache, LGA775, dual core)
Motherboard ASUS P5W-DH Deluxe NVIDIA nForce 590 SLI Reference
Memory 1GiB (2 x 512MiB) OCZ PC5400
Memory timings and speed 4-4-4-8 @ 667MHz (PC5300)
Graphics card(s) Sapphire Radeon X1950 Pro 256MiB (581/1400)
ATI Radeon X1900 GT (575/1200)
NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GS 256MiB (450/1320)
Disk drive(s) Seagate 160GB 7200.9 SATA 3Gbps
BIOS revision 1305 2.053.42
Mainboard software Intel Inf Update 8.0.1.1002 NVIDIA Platform Driver 9.37
Graphics driver CATALYST 6.10 Beta for '1950 Pro and CAT 6.8 for GT NVIDIA Forceware 91.47
Operating System Windows XP Professional, w/ SP2, 32-bit

Software

3D Benchmarks Far Cry v1.33
Quake 4 v1.04
Splinter Cell: Chaos Theory

Notes

We're comparing the performance of the Sapphire X1950 Pro 256MiB card against a reference-clocked Radeon X1900 GT and, from the green camp and weighing in at around the same money, a default-clocked GeForce 7900 GS 256MiB.

The trickle-down effect of technology now positions these powerful GPUs in the midrange sector, with retail examples available for around Ā£130. That's why we've chosen to test them with our Intel Core 2 Duo midrange system; the kind that setup that any one of these three GPUs would be used in.

Gaming performance was evaluated at 1280x1024 and 1600x1200. We ran 4xAA and 8xAF at the lower resolution and just 8xAF at 1600x1200. We feel that the settings are indicative of the kind of resolutions/quality a midrange graphics card should be able to provide, and the kind of monitors (TFTs, presumably) that folks would use with these kinds of systems.

The usual benchmarking bits apply too. We ran each benchmark a trio of times, discarding the outer results and reporting the middle one. If any of the three results looked erroneous, we threw all three away until we could collect three within a margin of statistical error. Any major attempts needed to get three reliable results we let you know about, of course. Apart from that, things are as noted on the graphs and in the graph commentary. Want to know more? Hit up the fantastic, awesome, entirely gorgeous HEXUS.community. You know it makes sense, etc, etc.

Reading the previous page informs you that the X1950 Pro will be faster than the X1900 GT. However, the real question is how it fares against the slightly cheaper NVIDIA 7900 GS?