Review: ASUS V9950 GeForce FX5900

Mmm, the retail version of UT2003 gives us the best benchmark experience of the review. For a reviewer, it's easy to benchmark, setup, and it looks pretty. We've got to watch the screen hundreds of times per review just to make sure things are on the level, it may as well look nice. You can see why I hate Comanche 4 now. Anyway, a base graph to get you started.

Whoops, I lost the midrange FX5600 Ultra, I'm still blaming Excel. Did someone say clock scaling?

Yep, they did, but not when we turn on IQ. UT2003 prefers the Radeon's implementation of our image enhancing settings, generating more performance than the NV35 boards. The ASUS and MSI do well however.

R350 wins, R300 second, NV35's get the handbags out for third and fourth spot.

The MSI disappears due to graphing gremlins but I bet you can't guess what its bars on the graph would look like? They'd look just like the ASUS' bars? You clever so and so! Time to wrap things up in our performance conclusion.