facebook rss twitter

Review: Sapphire Radeon X1800 GTO

by Ryszard Sommefeldt on 24 April 2006, 15:43

Tags: Sapphire Radeon X1800 GTO, Sapphire

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qafht

Add to My Vault: x

Radeon X1800 GTO Specification

Let's take a look at the configuration and spec for R520 that ATI set out for X1800 GTO, compared to NVIDIA G73.

ATI R520 vs G73; X1800 GTO vs 7600 GT
GPU ATI R520 NVIDIA G73
Process and Fabricator 90nm @ TSMC, 90GT w/ low-k
Die Size 288mm² 125mm²
Transistor Count 321M 177M
DirectX Shader Model Shader Model 3.0
Basic Configuration (VP/FP/ROP) 8/12/12 5/12/8
Vertex Shader Info VS3.0
5D FP32, co-issue MADD, branch
VS3.0
5D FP32, co-issue MADD, branch, tex
Fragment Processor Info PS3.0
4D FP32, dual and co-issue MADD/ADD, branch, tex
PS3.0
4D FP32, dual and co-issue MADD/MADD, branch, tex
ROP Info 6x FX8/FX16/FP16/Int10 MSAA (2 subsamples/cycle)
2x Z-only rate
FP/FX blender (inc. FP16)
4x FX8/FX16 MSAA (2 subsamples/cycle)
2x Z-only rate, 2x colour-only rate
FP/FX blender (inc. FP16)
Texture processing 12 FP32 address units, 12 samplers
Bi/Tri/Aniso (128-tap)
12 FP32 address units¹, 12 samplers
Bi/Tri/Aniso (128-tap), FP16 filtering
Memory Interface 256-bit, 8 memory channels
GDDR->GDDR3
128-bit, 2 memory channels
GDDR->GDDR3
Display output 2x dual-link DVI TMDS, ATI Avivo 1x dual-link DVI TMDS, 1x single-link DVI TMDS, NVIDIA PureVidio
Notes¹Texture address shared exclusive with first sub-ALU instruction issue

[advert] ATI's choice to use R520 in a mid-range product designed to compete with the G73-powered 7600 GT is somewhat telling. It's a big chip, somewhat at odds with the ethos behind a money-making part, but with ATI finding high-clocked RV530 uncompetitive, using a 'big gun' in cut-down form is needed.

Clocked at 500/500 (slower than 7600 GT's 560/700), Radeon X1800 GTO therefore uses its memory controller, VS unit count and 1:1 FP:ROP ratio to take the fight to 7600 GT. With a 256-bit external path to on-board memory and 12 ROPs, to pair with the same 8 vertex units of higher-spec Radeon X1800s, the GTO competes on paper in the performance stakes.

In terms of possible image quality, R520 has the edge over G73, allowing Radeon X1800 GTO to draw better looking final pixels. A higher level of high-quality, always gamma-correct anti-aliasing, the possibility of largely rotationally-invariant texture filtering, and NVIDIA-matching 'adaptive' AA mostly see to that.

Then you have a pair of dual-link TMDS transmitters on the GPU and support for ATI's Avivo video and display technology and there's no disputing that features-wise and on paper, Radeon X1800 GTO looks mightily impressive. Supporting Shader Model 3.0 and ATI Crossfire, it's the most feature complete mid-range graphics product on the market today.

As long as it competes performance-wise, there should be little to stop a hearty recommendation on the face of it all. Let's look at Sapphire's example before examining performance to see if the execution matches the promise of this initial exam.