facebook rss twitter

Review: EVGA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 Classified

by Tarinder Sandhu on 15 March 2012, 09:02 4.0

Tags: EVGA, NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qabdwv

Add to My Vault: x

Testing methodology

GPU comparisons

Graphics card GPU clock
(MHz)
Stream
processors
Shader clock
(MHz)
Memory clock
(MHz)
Memory bus
(bits)
Graphics driver
  NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 (3,072MB) 607 1,024 1,215 3,414 384 x 2 ForceWare 285.88
  NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 (1,536MB) 772 512 1,544 4,008 384 ForceWare 285.88
  NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 (1,280MB) 732 480 1,464 3,800 320 ForceWare 285.88
  EVGA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 CF (1,280MB) 797 448 1,594 3,900 320 ForceWare 295.73
  NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 (1,280MB) 732 448 1,464 3,800 320 ForceWare 285.88
  NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti (1,024MB) 822 384 1,645 4,008 256 ForceWare 285.88
  AMD Radeon HD 7970 (3,072MB) 925 2,048 925 5,500 384 Catalyst 12.1
  AMD Radeon HD 7950 (3,072MB) 800 1,792 800 5,000 384 Catalyst 12.1
  AMD Radeon HD 7870 (2,048MB) 1,000 1,280 1,000 4,800 256 Catalyst 12.1
  AMD Radeon HD 7850 (2,048MB) 860 1,024 860 4,800 256 Catalyst 12.1
  AMD Radeon HD 7770 (1,024MB) 1,000 640 1,000 4,500 128 Catalyst 12.1
  AMD Radeon HD 6990 (4,096MB) 830 3,072 830 5,000 256 x 2 Catalyst 12.1
  AMD Radeon HD 6970 (2,048MB) 880 1,536 880 5,500 256 Catalyst 12.1
  AMD Radeon HD 6950 (2,048MB) 800 1,408 800 5,000 256 Catalyst 12.1
  AMD Radeon HD 6870 (1,024MB) 900 1,120 900 4,200 256 Catalyst 12.1
  AMD Radeon HD 6850 (1,024MB) 775 960 775 4,000 256 Catalyst 12.1

HEXUS high-end test bench

Processor Intel Core i5-2500K (3.33GHz, 6MB smart cache, quad-core, LGA1155)
Motherboard Intel Desktop Board DP67BG
Memory 8GB Corsair Vengeance (9-9-9-24 @ 1,600MHz)
Power Supply Corsair AX850W
Monitor Dell 30in 3007WFP
Disk drive(s) Crucial RealSSD C300 (256GB)
Chassis Corsair Graphite Series 600T
Operating system Windows 7 Ultimate (64-bit, SP1)

HEXUS high-end benchmark suite

3DMark 11 Performance and Extreme presets
Aliens vs. Predator DX11, 1,920x1,080 and 2,560x1,600 resolutions, 4xAA, 16xAF, very high quality
Battlefield 3 DX11, 1,920x1,080 and 2,560x1,600 resolutions, 4xMSAA, 16xAF, ultra quality
Batman: Arkham City DX11, 1,920x1,080 and 2,560x1,600 resolutions, 8xMSAA, extreme quality
Crysis 2 DX11, 1,920x1,080 and 2,560x1,600 resolutions, 4xAA, ultra quality
Just Cause 2 DX10, 1,920x1,080 and 2,560x1,600 resolutions, 4xAA, 16xAF, very high quality
Total War: Shogun 2 DX11, 1,920x1,080 and 2,560x1,600 resolutions, 4xMSAA, 16xAF, high quality
Power Consumption To emulate real-world usage scenarios, we record mains power draw both when idle and whilst playing Crysis 2
Temperature To emulate real-world usage scenarios, we record GPU core temperature both when idle and whilst playing Crysis 2
Noise A PCE-318 meter is used to record noise levels when idle and whilst playing Crysis 2
Overclocking Pushing the graphics card as far as it will go, we increase speeds and re-run the Aliens vs. Predator benchmark
HEXUS bang4buck A custom metric used to evaluate comparative performance with price factored in

Notes

We've updated the GeForce driver to the 295.73 WHQL for this card - it was benchmarked just before the release of the 296.10 set. Knowing that a pre-overclocked Ti 560 448 performs at around the same levels as a GTX 570 at stock speeds, we can also examine the improvements, if any, over the 285.88 set, as used on all other GeForces.

Remember, keep an eye out for the performance of the Radeon HD 7850. Readers who own the Radeon HD 6950 2GB may also like to keep note of where this Fermi card fits into the overall landscape just before the launch of the Kepler GPU(s).