Test Methodology
Comparison Processor Configurations |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPU | Intel |
AMD |
||||||
Core i5-4210Y |
Core i5-4250U |
Core i3-4330 |
Core i5-4670 |
A8-7600K |
A10-7850K |
A8-6500T |
A10-6800K |
|
CPU TDP | 11.5W |
15W |
54W |
84W |
65W/45W |
95W |
65W |
100W |
Socket | BGA 1168 |
BGA 1168 |
LGA 1150 |
LGA 1150 |
FM2+ |
FM2+ |
FM2 |
FM2 |
Fabrication | 22nm |
22nm |
22nm |
22nm |
28nm |
28nm |
32nm |
32nm |
Motherboard | Sony Vaio Haswell ULT |
Intel NUC Reference |
Gigabyte Z87-D3HP |
ASRock FM2A88X-ITX+ |
||||
BIOS | R0290V8 |
2135 |
F5 |
1.90 |
||||
DDR3 Memory | 4GB (1x4GB) |
8GB (2x4GB) |
AMD Gamer Series 16GB (2x8GB) |
|||||
Memory Timings | 11-11-11-28-1T @ 1,600MHz |
11-11-11-28-1T @ 1,600MHz |
9-10-9-27-2T @ 1,866MHz |
10-11-11-28-2T @ 2,133MHz |
9-10-9-27-2T @ 1,600MHz |
10-11-11-28-2T @ 2,133MHz |
||
Integrated Graphics | HD 4200 |
HD 5000 |
HD 4600 |
HD 4600 |
Radeon R7 |
Radeon R7 |
HD 8550D |
HD 8670D |
Disk Drive | Toshiba THNSNH128GMCT 128GB |
Plextor PX-128M5M 128GB |
Samsung 840 Pro 250GB |
|||||
Chassis | Sony Tap 11 |
Intel NUC D54250WYK |
Corsair Graphite 600T |
|||||
Power Supply | Sony External (44W) |
Intel External (65W) |
Corsair AX760i (760W) |
|||||
Operating System | Windows 8.1 64-bit |
|||||||
CPU and Memory Benchmarks |
||||||||
HEXUS PiFast | Our number-crunching benchmark stresses a single core by calculating Pi to 10m places | |||||||
Cinebench R15 | Using Cinebench's multi-CPU render, this cross-platform benchmark stresses all cores | |||||||
wPrime 2.1.0 | Another number-crunching benchmark that stresses all available CPU cores/threads | |||||||
AIDA64 v4.00.2746 | Benchmark that analyses memory bandwidth and latency | |||||||
Multimedia Benchmarks |
||||||||
LuxMark 2.0 | An OpenCL rendering benchmark | |||||||
Musemage 1.9.6 | An OpenCL image-manipulation benchmark (64-bit) | |||||||
Handbrake 0.9.9.1 | Free-to-use video encoder that stresses all CPU cores (64-bit) | |||||||
System Benchmarks |
||||||||
PCMark 8 v2.0 | System-wide examination that uses the Home preset, run with OpenCL acceleration | |||||||
3DMark | DX11, run at the Firestrike default test | |||||||
SiSoft Sandra 2014 | Aggregate score that takes a composite of 12 system-wide benchmarks | |||||||
Gaming Benchmarks |
||||||||
BioShock Infinite | DX9, 1,280x720, medium quality | |||||||
GRID 2 | DX9, 1,280x720, high quality | |||||||
Total War: Rome II | DX9, 1,280x720, medium quality | |||||||
Miscellaneous Benchmarks |
||||||||
Power Consumption | While idling and when running wPrime and GRID 2 |
Notes
The Core i5-4210Y is the only Y-Series Intel Haswell processor in our lineup. To provide a meaningful comparison, we've included benchmark results from another socketed Intel chip, the Core i5-4250U featured in current-generation NUC PCs.
We fully expect the ultra-low-power Core i5-4210Y to feature at the bottom of most graphs - many of the competing chips are fully-fledged desktop parts - but it'll be interesting to see exactly how much performance is lost in order to meet the greatly-reduced TDP.