facebook rss twitter

Review: Intel 32nm Core i5 661 Westmere CPU+GPU performance numbers

by David Ross on 4 January 2010, 09:00 3.45

Tags: Intel (NASDAQ:INTC)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qavfu

Add to My Vault: x

Doing more than one thing at once

Now examining multi-tasking performance, here's the StaxRip encoding benchmark we've displayed on page four.

StaxRip X264 + AAC encoding - pass one
Intel Core i5 750AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE AMD Phenom II X4 905eIntel Core 2 Duo E8500Intel Core i5 661Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
213209277407286.67253.5


Megatasking 1 - StaxRip encoding + QuickTime
Intel Core i5 750AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE AMD Phenom II X4 905eIntel Core 2 Duo E8500Intel Core i5 661Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
245245334602.5356328


Now here's the same test but with a 1080p QuickTime clip being played at the same time. x264 takes longer to encode with the QuickTime load, of course, but the stinker here is the dual-core E8500. The Core i5 661's performance is the second slowest, yet it's in the same ballpark as the others.

Megatasking 2 - StaxRip encoding + ET:QW
Intel Core i5 750AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE AMD Phenom II X4 905eIntel Core 2 Duo E8500Intel Core i5 661Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
298369490882399356.5


The same encoding with ET:QW looping in the foreground. Core i5 661 keeps reasonably close to the two premium quad-core chips.

Megatasking 3 - ET:QW + StaxRip encoding
Intel Core i5 750AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE AMD Phenom II X4 905eIntel Core 2 Duo E8500Intel Core i5 661Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
148.3838.5538.725.5730.7223


And now the average frame-rate with the encoding going on in the background. All IGP-based gaming is slow and jerky. The best of the bunch, from what we observed, was the Phenom II X4 965 BE.

Having a discrete card helps massively, naturally, and the benchmark playback of the GeForce GT 220 is smooth and fast.