facebook rss twitter

Review: Intel Core i7 - everything that Core 2 should have been - performance numbers

by Tarinder Sandhu on 3 November 2008, 09:31 4.0

Tags: Core i7, Intel (NASDAQ:INTC), PC

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qapz5

Add to My Vault: x

Bandwidth, latency, and single-threaded performance

Sciencemark 2 memory latency
Intel Core i7 965 EEIntel Core i7 920AMD Phenom X4 9950 BEIntel C2E QX6800Intel C2E QX9770Intel C2Q Q9450Intel Core i7 940
35.6237.957.356.4149.4855.4337.55


SiSoft Sandra Win64 memory bandwidth float buffered
Intel Core i7 965 EEIntel Core i7 920AMD Phenom X4 9950 BEIntel C2E QX6800Intel C2E QX9770Intel C2Q Q9450Intel Core i7 940
20.1617.029.575.257.336.6417.15


HEXUS.PiFast - calculation to 10m places
Intel Core i7 965 EEIntel Core i7 920AMD Phenom X4 9950 BEIntel C2E QX6800Intel C2E QX9770Intel C2Q Q9450Intel Core i7 940
26.6632.0945.9532.6829.1734.5529.22


Our architectural look hinted at the prospect of memory bandwidth and latency being good. Bandwidth is off the chart, compared to the others, even for the 920 and 940 processors with memory operating at 1,066MHz in tri-channel mode. This is helped by having a direct link from main RAM to the integrated memory-controller on the CPU itself.

Latency, too, is pretty impressive for the three Core i7 processors.

Bring those together, along with the other parts of Core 7, and it beats out equivalently-clocked Core 2s in our single-threaded HEXUS.PiFast test. Indeed, a 2.93GHz Core i7 benchmarks the same as a 3.2GHz Core 2 QX9770.