facebook rss twitter

Review: Intel Xeon 3.4GHz ['Nocona' core]

by Ryszard Sommefeldt on 18 August 2004, 00:00

Tags: Intel (NASDAQ:INTC)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qazw

Add to My Vault: x

Canopus ProCoder

Canopus ProCoder is a 'professional' level media encoding system, able to output all kinds of video formats from a wide range of input sources. Conversions can be batched, it can demux video and audio, and it can output multiple differing formats from a single source, all multi-threaded.

I use a variety of source inputs to ProCoder's conversion engine, creating AVI and streaming WMV9 video outputs from a high-bitrate MPEG2 source clip, before outputting PAL DVD from that created AVI source. Three encodes in total, audio included.

AVI output from MPEG2 source

AVI output from MPEG2 source

The Xeon system is nearly 17% slower when converting to AVI from high-bitrate MPEG2 source using ProCoder. Multi-threaded and supporting HyperThreading, Intel themselves use Mainconcept's encoder to show off Pentium 4 and Xeon performance. I'm guessing they don't use an MPEG2 to AVI conversion.

Streaming Windows Media Video 9 output from MPEG2 source

Streaming Windows Media Video 9 output from MPEG2 source

There's nothing to split either system here, indicating either truly matched performance, or a disk I/O bottleneck. Analysing what happens with disk I/O while the encoder is being run shows that it's not I/O limited, so the CPUs are equally at home here.

PAL DVD from AVI source

PAL DVD from AVI source

This time the Opteron system is slower by nearly 9%. Again, a nice demonstration using ProCoder that depending on the conversion being done, and therefore the encoding engine being used, fast Opteron or Xeon may be the better tool for the job.