facebook rss twitter

Review: Intel 520 Series SSD (240GB)

by Parm Mann on 6 February 2012, 16:00 4.0

Tags: Intel (NASDAQ:INTC)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qabb5j

Add to My Vault: x

Final thoughts and rating

Intel's 520 Series SSD is undoubtedly a good match for any high-end PC; it's lightning-quick in various scenarios, and if you're coming from a traditional hard disk, it'll provide a jolt in performance that few other components can offer. But it's important to put the drive's capabilities into context.

Second-generation SandForce solutions have been available for the best part of a year, and Intel's woefully-late arrival on the scene doesn't push the envelope in terms of performance. A custom firmware that we suspect will remain exclusive to Intel helps eke out an additional drop of speed, but the real kicker here is the manufacturer's promise of "obsessively high reliability."

For all the concerns that have been raised over SandForce stability in recent months, Intel's adoption of the technology could act as a seal of approval that alleviates the few lingering doubts. Only time will determine exactly how robust the 520 Series drive really is, but a five-year limited Intel warranty is very reassuring.

Bottom line: the 520 Series demands attention from anyone in the market for a high-performance SSD.

The Good

Sequential throughput in excess of 500MB/s
Strong performance at high queue depths
Comes with a five-year warranty
It's got Intel's name on it

The Bad

Performance takes a hit with certain data types
Pricier than rival SandForce solutions

HEXUS Rating


Intel 520 Series (240GB)

HEXUS Awards


Intel 520 Series (240GB)

HEXUS Where2Buy

The reviewed 240GB Intel 520 Series SSD is available to purchase from scan.co.uk*.

HEXUS Right2Reply

At HEXUS, we invite the companies whose products we test to comment on our articles. If any company representatives for the products reviewed choose to respond, we'll publish their commentary here verbatim.



*UK-based HEXUS community members are eligible for free delivery and priority customer service through the SCAN.care@HEXUS forum.



HEXUS Forums :: 10 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
*If* I was going to but a Sandforce drive then this would be it… I still lean towards a Crucial m4 though… maybe, this is the first drive that's close to making me reconsider what I'd recommend to people, it's not a step up enough to change my 256GB m4 of course.
I'm still happier with my image based RAMdrive using ImDisk Virtual Disk Driver, on CrystalDiskMark it gets seq 5687r 7565w, 512k 5538r 7258w, 4k 759.9r 541.6w, 4k qd32 1696r 1048w.
I'd love to see the guys do a comparison of this against the ssd's for all the metrics. It beats ssd's on pure speed at all datapoints, in ATTO even the 0.5k is 91044w and 124324r.
Can you guys update the M4s to the current firmware? its a massive improvement and id would make it look better :P.

Must say that yeah it helps credibility but the problem is SandForce not the nand or anything, its the controller that causes all these problems. I cant see it being that stable… reliable as in it wont break yeah probably but i can still sense BSOD and other issues :P.

Also, price is terrible… why buy it when you can buy the corsair performance pro for £323 at scan, the 520 is currently £406! You get 16gb more space on the corsair drive AND its better all round (bar IOPs, i feel that metrix is valid for anything bar servers now adays) and proven marvel controller reliability.

hmm…
I see a lot of whinging about the reliability of sandforce based drives.

1. Should i be worried about my Force GT (bought around sept last year)?
2. Is there a decent place to read up on it that isn't just a load of douchebags banging on about their opinions?
Biscuit
I see a lot of whinging about the reliability of sandforce based drives.

1. Should i be worried about my Force GT (bought around sept last year)?
2. Is there a decent place to read up on it that isn't just a load of douchebags banging on about their opinions?

There was issues across all different drives when the SF-2281(?) controller launched but these seem to be ironed out now. The other issue is that you don't consistently get the 500MB/s read/write that is advertised due to nature of the controller.

Obviously when the two are mixed it is hard to put a positive spin on the SF based drives, IMO, especially when there is competition in the same price-brackets without as detrimental issues on the surface. As for your driver specifically I'd check to make sure that it has the latest recommended firmware and see if it has patched any glaring reliability holes.

OTOH: Its a Corsair drive so your in good hands should it go tits up. My personal advice would be to buy Crucial/Intel's own controller based drives for complete peace of mind if you're in the market for an SSD.

I know you didn't want an opinion so to speak - i hope mine isn't a douchey one. :P